ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Polygenic scores for precision psychiatry: a study on the effect heterogeneity of antidepressants.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Antidepressants are recommended as the initial choice of treatment for moderate and severe depression, but the choice of antidepressant class can be challenging, with the possibility of serious adverse events such as increased suicidality with antidepressant initiation. Objective: To evaluate the utility of polygenic scores in predicting heterogeneous effects of antidepressants on suicidal thoughts. Design: Using genetic and clinical data on both children and adults with major depressive disorder from the All of Us Research Program, we used a target trial emulation framework to evaluate the heterogeneous effects of antidepressants on suicidal thoughts across genetic characteristics. Setting: Longitudinal cohort from the All of Us Research Program. Participants: More than 7,000 patients, both children and adults, with major depressive disorder. Interventions: The initiation of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), compared to the initiation of serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) and bupropion. Main Outcomes and Measures: The effects of antidepressants on suicidal thoughts, as well as subgroup effects across polygenic scores (PGSs) of various psychiatric disorders. Results: Patients with higher PGS for psychiatric disorders, particularly for attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), were more likely than those with lower scores to experience suicidal thoughts with the initiation of SSRIs, relative to bupropion (hazard ratio 1.66, 95%CI, 1.30-2.12, for participants with ADHD PGS higher than median vs. hazard ratio 1.06, 95%CI, 0.81-1.38, for participants with ADHD PGS lower than median; P-for-interaction, 0.01). We observed a similar trend for schizophrenia, although the interaction was not statistically significant (hazard ratio 1.52, 95%CI, 1.19-1.93, for participants with schizophrenia PGS higher than median vs. hazard ratio 1.1.17, 95%CI, 0.89-1.53, for participants with ADHD PGS lower than median; P-for-interaction, 0.16). We did not observe differences in the effects of SSRIs relative to SNRIs across PGSs. Conclusions and Relevance: The genetic predisposition to psychiatric disorders may, at least partially, underlie the heterogeneity in the risk of suicidal thoughts with antidepressant use. In the personalized medicine framework, PGSs for various psychiatric disorders may help tailor antidepressants to each patient to avoid serious adverse effects such as suicidal thoughts.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.