ArticleBMJ public health2025
Intention to have blood-based multi-cancer early detection (MCED) screening among men and women aged 50-77 years from Black and Asian backgrounds: a cross-sectional survey in Great Britain.
Article in BMJ public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evolving attitudes towards cancer screening: a 2024 update of UK population views.British journal of cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Uptake of cancer screening is lower among people from minority ethnic groups. We aimed to quantify intention and potential barriers and facilitators to uptake of blood-based multi-cancer early detection (MCED) screening among men and women from Asian and Black ethnic backgrounds in Great Britain, if it were offered in the future. Methods: Adults aged 50-77 who self-identified as being from Asian (n=268) and Black (n=137) ethnic backgrounds completed an online survey assessing intention to have MCED screening and barriers/facilitators to uptake. We explored associations between socio-demographics/general attitudes to cancer and intention, and report endorsement of barriers and facilitators. We also compared intention and barriers/facilitators to a sample of men and women from White backgrounds who completed the same survey. Results: Most participants said they would 'definitely' or 'probably' have MCED screening if offered (88.3% among Black participants and 92.2% among Asian participants). Positive intention was associated with previous screening participation and general cancer attitudes but not with age, socioeconomic status or education. Compared with a sample of participants from White backgrounds, intention was slightly lower in those from Black backgrounds (94.3% vs 88.3%) and participants in the Asian and Black samples were significantly more likely to endorse practical barriers, perceived more disadvantages to blood tests and were more likely to be put off by concern about a 'positive' result. Those from Asian backgrounds also reported lower benefits of blood tests and lower health motivation than the White comparison group. Fear of the outcome was not significantly different across groups. Conclusions: MCED screening intention was high with no evidence of socio-demographic variation. Some barriers and facilitators were more frequently anticipated among men and women from Black and Asian backgrounds compared with the White comparison sample. This research highlights important targets for information provision and support to help limit inequalities if blood-based MCED screening is introduced in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.