ReviewJournal of pain research2025
Pocket Fills for Intrathecal Pump Delivery Systems: A Narrative Review.
Review in Journal of pain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-World Complication Profiles of Fully and Semi-Implanted Intrathecal Drug Delivery Systems for Cancer Pain: A Large Single-Center Chinese Cohort.Pain and therapy · 2026Article
- Fifteen years of intrathecal baclofen therapy in China: complications, safety governance, and a multimodal neuromodulation strategy.Acta neurochirurgica · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Intrathecal drug delivery systems (IDDS) are an increasingly common treatment option in the management of refractory chronic pain. IDDS allow for highly customizable administration of medication directly into the intrathecal space, optimizing therapeutic benefit while minimizing systemic side effects. Understanding potential complications of IDDS is key for patient safety. This narrative review examines pocket fills, a potential complication that occurs when inadvertently missing the port on the intrathecal pump reservoir during a pump refill, resulting in the injection of the medication into the surrounding subcutaneous tissue. It is suspected that pocket fill events are vastly underreported and understudied despite posing serious risk for patient safety. Given the limited existing research discussing pocket fills, this narrative review will provide an overview of pocket fills including the anatomy of the intrathecal pump placement, risk factors for pocket fills, preventative techniques, as well as post pocket fill recommendations. Key preventative techniques highlighted include the application of firm pressure throughout the procedure, imaging guidance, as well as post procedure monitoring and device interrogation. As there is a lack of clinical guidelines for pocket fill prevention, we advise tailoring these strategies to available resources and individual patient needs. As IDDS utilization continues to evolve in clinical practice, future quality improvement initiatives could focus on the development of standardized refill protocols, simulation-based training courses and competency assessments, while future research initiatives could focus on comparative analyses of pump refill complication rates under imaging guidance in comparison to template guidance, as well as early detection monitoring technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.