Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40661221›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology2025

Symptom burden in end-stage liver disease: a prospective cohort study of the symptoms experienced by patients and the role of palliative care.

Hugo M Oliveira, Filipa Ribeiro, Graça Lopes, Eliana Frias, Filipe Andrade, Verónica Guiomar, Eduardo Eiras, Francisca Rego, Rui Nunes

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06181474 (Assessment of the Symptomatic Burden of Patients With Advanced Chronic Liver Disease. Correlation Between the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06181474 completednot on this map

Assessment of the Symptomatic Burden of Patients With Advanced Chronic Liver Disease. Correlation Between the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD)-Na and the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System Scale (ESAS).

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorUnidade Local de Saúde de Matosinhos, EPERan2024 to 2025Enrolled44ConditionsPalliative Care, End Stage Liver DIseaseArmsESAS
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hugo M OliveiraDepartment of Social Sciences and Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3732-4530
Filipa RibeiroPalliative Care Unit, Matosinhos Local Health Unit, Matosinhos, Portugal.
Graça LopesPalliative Care Unit, Matosinhos Local Health Unit, Matosinhos, Portugal.
Eliana FriasPalliative Care Unit, Matosinhos Local Health Unit, Matosinhos, Portugal.
Filipe AndradeHepato-Bilio-Pancreatic Oncology Group, Matosinhos Local Health Unit, Matosinhos, Portugal.
Verónica GuiomarHepato-Bilio-Pancreatic Oncology Group, Matosinhos Local Health Unit, Matosinhos, Portugal.
Eduardo EirasHepato-Bilio-Pancreatic Oncology Group, Matosinhos Local Health Unit, Matosinhos, Portugal.
Francisca RegoDepartment of Social Sciences and Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Rui NunesDepartment of Social Sciences and Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Liver disease is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) experience multiple physical symptoms. Despite the poor prognosis and significant symptom burden, palliative care integration remains limited. Objectives: To assess the symptom burden in ESLD patients, the viability of applying a symptom scale in routine evaluations, and to assess the impact of palliative care on symptom management. Design: Observational, prospective cohort study. Methods: We prospectively included patients with chronic liver disease following their first episode of decompensation or diagnosis of hepatocarcinoma (HCC). Data collected included patient demographics, ESLD etiology, history of decompensation, and patient-reported symptom burden. Two-sided tests were used to identify factors of disease severity and evaluate the benefits of palliative care intervention. Results: Forty-four patients were assessed, divided into two cohorts: palliative care cohort (52.3%; Conclusion: Significant differences in symptom prevalence were observed between the two cohorts, likely due to specific clinical characteristics of each group. The use of a symptom assessment scale proved to be simple and effective, revealing a high prevalence of symptoms. Palliative care was associated with a positive impact on symptom management. Trial registration: NCT06181474.

Indexed as

end-stage liver diseasehepatologyliver cirrhosispainpalliative care

Identifiers

PMID40661221
PMCPMC12256754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.