ArticleNorth American Spine Society journal2025
Biomechanical analysis of trivergent, a new posterior lumbar spinal fixation system.
Article in North American Spine Society journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Biomechanical analysis of a novel, triangular spinal fixation system.North American Spine Society journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pedicle screw fixation provides stability after posterior lumbar spine surgery. Traditional pedicle screw devices face several complications, including loose and broken screws. A strategy addressing these issues is to eliminate sources of failure and optimize the biomechanical advantage of using a "triangle" in these devices. The purpose of this study was to measure the biomechanical properties of the Trivergent spinal fixation system and compare it to a predicate construct (ie, an FDA approved similar device against which testing is compared), Here, we report the biomechanical results of a new plate-based, triangular fixation device. Methods: The ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) protocol included 3 forms of testing: static compression bending, static torsion, and dynamic compression bending. 3 predicate constructs, 3 Trivergent 60° constructs, and 3 Trivergent 75° constructs were tested in both static compression bending and static torsion. 3 predicate constructs, 4 Trivergent 60° constructs, and 7 Trivergent 75° constructs were tested in dynamic compression bending. Results: In static compression bending, the Trivergent 60°, Trivergent 75°, and predicate constructs tolerated average ultimate loads of 480 N, 550 N, and 400 N, and demonstrated average ultimate moments of 26.5 N-m, 30.2 N-m, and 18.6 N-m, respectively. In static torsion, the Trivergent 60°, Trivergent 75°, and predicate constructs tolerated average yield torques of 44 N-m, 34 N-m, and 20.5 N-m, and demonstrated an average torsional stiffness of 14 N-m/deg, 13 N-m/deg, and 5.22 N-m/deg, respectively. In dynamic compression bending, the Trivergent 60°, Trivergent 75°, and predicate constructs tolerated maximum loads of 300 N (maximum load tested), 230 N, and 160 N, respectively. Conclusions: Hardware failure in posterior spinal pedicle screw fixation devices is common, and includes issues such as screw migration and rod breakage. The Trivergent device was designed to address these complications by incorporating characteristics such as screw divergence and cortical bone engagement. This study provides evidence of the biomechanical strength of Trivergent, supporting its potential ability to improve outcomes for posterior lumbar fusion surgery. Future cadaveric and human studies would help to substantiate the utility of Trivergent in treating degenerative disc disease, spinal stenosis, and other pathologies of the lumbar spine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.