Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40661173›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025

Using social media listening to identify the real-world challenges faced by dog owners globally when administering oral medications.

Georgina Tarrant, Taranpreet Rai, Andrea Wright, Travis Street, Kevin Wells

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Georgina TarrantSurrey DataHub, vHive, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.
Taranpreet RaiSurrey DataHub, vHive, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.
Andrea WrightOutcomes Research, Zoetis Inc., Parsippany, NJ, United States.
Travis StreetSurrey DataHub, vHive, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.
Kevin WellsSurrey DataHub, vHive, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Pet owner compliance with oral medication administration represents a significant challenge in veterinary medicine, yet limited real-world data exists on the experiences and barriers faced by dog owners during at-home "pilling" processes. Methods: This study employed social media listening (SML) to analyze 4,787 relevant posts from X, Reddit, Facebook, blogs, and forums discussing oral medication administration to dogs. Large language models (LLMs) were used for data cleaning, relevancy filtering and analysis. Topic modeling, sentiment and thematic analyses were conducted to identify key themes and challenges. Results: Analysis revealed significant anxiety and fear associated with medication administration, with 12% of posts mentioning anxiety and additional fear-related terms appearing in 1-3% of posts. Only 7.6% of posts discussed soft/chewable medications, which showed positive sentiment and preference. Geographic analysis showed posts predominantly from English-speaking countries (US 70.3%, UK 17.8%). Five major themes emerged from X, Reddit, blogs and forums: general medication/veterinary experiences, pill types and practices, pill delivery methods, specific medications/preventatives, product reviews/natural remedies. Financial concerns were prominent, with pet owners describing medication costs as barriers to optimal care. Successful pilling strategies included hiding pills in peanut butter, cheese or meat products; crushing pills and mixing with food, and using distraction techniques. Discussion: The study identified key barriers to compliance including financial constraints, fear and anxiety, mistrust of veterinary advice and practical administration challenges. Pet owners showed higher adherence when treatments visibly improved quality of life or addressed chronic conditions. Chewable formulations were preferred but raised concerns about accidental overdosing. The methodology demonstrated that SML combined with AI analysis effectively captures real-world pet owner experiences. Conclusions: This novel approach revealed that dog owners face significant psychological and practical barriers when administering oral medications. Chewable formulations may improve compliance, though proper storage and education are essential. The study provides veterinarians with evidence-based successful pilling strategies reported by pet owners and highlights the need for better communication about treatment benefits, financial planning options and alternative delivery methods to improve medication adherence.

Indexed as

caninesdogslarge language modelsoral formulationspalatabilitypulsar platformsocial mediatopic modeling

Identifiers

PMID40661173
PMCPMC12258389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.