ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025
Effects of diet type on the core fecal bacterial taxa and the dysbiosis index of healthy adult dogs.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Coprophagy in Healthy Dogs Does Not Alter Fecal Core Microbiota or Increase Carriage of Enteropathogens.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- PasteurizedMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- An Ecological Framework for Interpreting the Canine Gut Microbiome.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- The Collaborative Collapse: Bile Acid Dysmetabolism as a Central Pathogenic Driver in Canine and Feline Multi-Systemic Disorders-From Mechanisms to Precision Therapeutics.Veterinary sciences · 2026Review
- Impacts of a fresh-frozen dog food on fecal consistency and microbiome in colony dogs.Journal of animal science · 2026Article
- Microbial Gene Profiling and Targeted Metabolomics in Fecal Samples of Dogs With Chronic Enteropathy With or Without Increased Dysbiosis Index.Journal of veterinary internal medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is great interest in studying the canine gastrointestinal microbiome. In healthy dogs versus those with acute and chronic enteropathies, specific bacterial taxa have been identified that are consistently associated with shifts in the microbiome. A qPCR-based dysbiosis index (DI) that assesses microbiome shifts was developed based on a subset of these taxa. Because most dogs consume kibble diets, published data on core bacteria and the DI were largely derived from dogs consuming that diet form. Because dietary composition impacts the microbiome, it was unknown whether data from dogs consuming other diet types would adhere to reported core taxa abundance and DI guidelines. The study's aim was to determine the fecal abundance of core bacteria and DI of dogs fed commercially available kibble vs. mildly-cooked human-grade (fresh) diets. Fecal samples collected from adult dogs across four experiments were used (4 kibble diets,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.