ArticleBMJ neurology open2025
Shared neural signatures in Functional Neurological Disorder and Chronic Pain: a multimodal narrative review.
Article in BMJ neurology open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neurofeedback for functional neurological disorders: future directions for research and clinical practice.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2026Review
- Article
- Pain-related disability in functional neurological disorder (FND): the role of pain intensity and psychological factors.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Long-term conditions and symptom-based disorders - A community perspective.Future healthcare journal · 2026Article
- Neuroimaging-Guided Insights into the Molecular and Network Mechanisms of Chronic Pain and Neuromodulation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Quantitative electroencephalography as a next-generation tool in neurodiagnostics: significance, clinical applications, and practical interpretative frameworks.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Functional neurological disorder (FND) frequently co-exists with chronic pain (CP), notably nociceptive and nociplastic (primary) pain disorders. The considerable overlap implies shared underlying mechanisms because of their similar clinical and epidemiological profiles. Although standard neuroimaging and electrophysiological tests typically show normal results in both FND and primary pain disorders, recent advancements in neuroimaging techniques have begun identifying neural biomarkers common to both conditions, though these findings remain preliminary and require further exploration. Method: We performed a detailed literature review of studies investigating neural activity in FND and chronic pain using electroencephalogram, magneto-encephalography, functional MRI, positron emission tomography and single photon emission computed tomography. Given the diverse nature of the reviewed studies, the synthesis is presented narratively. Results: Despite methodological differences, convergent data suggest disrupted neural networks across both FND and CP. Common findings include (1) hyperactivation of sensorimotor networks, (2) altered activity within the default mode network-a critical region for self-referential thought-and (3) dysfunction in emotional processing regions, notably the anterior cingulate cortex and insula. Thalamocortical dysrhythmia was identified as a potential unifying concept, characterised by abnormal theta and beta oscillations that enhance pain perception in CP and trigger functional symptoms in FND. Both conditions also exhibit reduced alpha oscillations, likely amplifying sensory sensitivity and emotional responsiveness. Conclusion: This review highlights shared neural abnormalities (Triple Network model) and introduces thalamocortical dysrhythmia as a novel explanatory framework linking FND and CP. Future research should target populations with coexisting disorders, potentially paving the way for innovative treatments, including hypnosis and neuromodulation/neurofeedback.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.