Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40661138›Full record

ReviewMedComm2025

Phage and Endolysin Therapy Against Antibiotics Resistant Bacteria: From Bench to Bedside.

Majid Taati Moghadam, Samane Mohebi, Raheleh Sheikhi, Meysam Hasannejad-Bibalan, Shahla Shahbazi, Shadman Nemati

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in MedComm, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Phage-Derived Endolysins TargetingAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Bacteriophages targetingFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Majid Taati MoghadamDepartment of Microbiology Virology and Microbial toxins School of Medicine Guilan University of Medical Sciences Rasht Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1557-3648
Samane MohebiDepartment of Bacteriology and Virology School of Medicine Shiraz University of Medical Sciences Shiraz Iran.
Raheleh SheikhiDepartment of Microbiology Virology and Microbial toxins School of Medicine Guilan University of Medical Sciences Rasht Iran.
Meysam Hasannejad-BibalanDepartment of Microbiology Virology and Microbial toxins School of Medicine Guilan University of Medical Sciences Rasht Iran.
Shahla ShahbaziInfectious Diseases Research Center Health Policy and Promotion Institute Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences Kermanshah Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6325-1075
Shadman NematiOtorhinolaryngology Research Center School of Medicine Guilan University of Medical Sciences Rasht Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid global spread of antibiotic-resistant bacteria presents a growing public health crisis, threatening the efficacy of existing antimicrobial treatments. As traditional antibiotics become increasingly ineffective, alternative therapies such as bacteriophages and endolysins have gained renewed scientific and clinical interest. These biological agents, naturally derived from bacteriophage life cycles, exhibit potent and selective antibacterial activity, especially against multidrug-resistant pathogens. Despite decades of research, the clinical translation of phage and endolysin therapies remains limited due to regulatory, delivery, and stability challenges. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the mechanisms, advantages, and limitations of both bacteriophages and endolysins, including their structure, mode of action, and interaction with bacterial hosts. Particular attention is given to combination therapies, where synergistic effects have been observed-especially in biofilm-associated infections. We also explore the latest findings from preclinical studies, clinical trials, and compassionate-use cases, with an emphasis on genetically engineered and synthetic variants that enhance therapeutic potential. Furthermore, we discuss manufacturing challenges, regulatory barriers, and future directions such as personalized phage therapy and engineered endolysins. By synthesizing current knowledge, this review highlights the academic and translational significance of phage and endolysin-based approaches in combating antibiotic-resistant infections.

Indexed as

antibiotic‐resistant infectionsendolysinengineered endolysinsengineered phagesphage

Identifiers

PMID40661138
PMCPMC12256688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.