Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40661120›Full record

ArticleNational science review2025

Aqueous-phase secondary organic aerosol formation on mineral dust.

Weijun Li, Akinori Ito, Guochen Wang, Minkang Zhi, Liang Xu, Qi Yuan, Jian Zhang, Lei Liu, Feng Wu, Alexander Laskin and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in National science review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Weijun LiState Key Laboratory of Ocean Sensing and Department of Atmospheric Sciences, School of Earth Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China.
Akinori ItoYokohama Institute for Earth Sciences, JAMSTEC, Yokohama 236-0001, Japan.
Guochen WangState Key Laboratory of Ocean Sensing and Department of Atmospheric Sciences, School of Earth Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China.
Minkang ZhiState Key Laboratory of Ocean Sensing and Department of Atmospheric Sciences, School of Earth Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China.
Liang XuState Key Laboratory of Ocean Sensing and Department of Atmospheric Sciences, School of Earth Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China.
Qi YuanState Key Laboratory of Ocean Sensing and Department of Atmospheric Sciences, School of Earth Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China.
Jian ZhangState Key Laboratory of Ocean Sensing and Department of Atmospheric Sciences, School of Earth Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China.
Lei LiuState Key Laboratory of Ocean Sensing and Department of Atmospheric Sciences, School of Earth Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7171-1454
Feng WuKey Laboratory of Aerosol Chemistry & Physics and State Key Laboratory of Loess and Quaternary Geology, Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xi'an 710061, China.
Alexander LaskinDepartment of Chemistry, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Daizhou ZhangFaculty of Environmental and Symbiotic Sciences, Prefectural University of Kumamoto, Kumamoto 862-8502, Japan.
Xiaoye ZhangKey Laboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry of CMA, Institute of Atmospheric Composition, Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, Beijing 100081, China.
Tong ZhuCollege of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2752-7924
Jianmin ChenShanghai Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Particle Pollution and Prevention, Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5859-3070
Nikolaos MihalopoulosInstitute for Environmental Research and Sustainable Development, National Observatory of Athens, Athens 15236, Greece.
Aikaterini BougiatiotiInstitute for Environmental Research and Sustainable Development, National Observatory of Athens, Athens 15236, Greece.
Maria KanakidouEnvironmental Chemical Processes Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, University of Crete, Heraklion 70013, Greece.
Gehui WangKey Lab of Geographic Information Science of the Ministry of Education, School of Geographic Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 210062, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0181-4685
Huilin HuSchool of Environmental Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China.
Yue ZhaoSchool of Environmental Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China.
Zongbo ShiSchool of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7157-543X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Secondary organic aerosol (SOA) is a significant component of airborne particles that impacts air quality, health, and climate globally. Aqueous-phase reactions contribute substantially to SOA mass. However, this process is primarily treated as occurring in submicron particles that contain water, or within cloud droplets in state-of-the-art models. Here, we challenged this conventional view by showing that >50% of water-soluble organic carbon (WSOC), predominantly SOA, is found in supermicron particles during dust events downwind of Saharan and Asian dust sources. Even on non-dust days, supermicron WSOC contributes 25%-51% of total WSOC. Microscopic analyses revealed that organic matter was only detected on aged dust containing a calcium nitrate coating, which contains water at typical ambient relative humidity conditions. This suggests that it is the water-containing nitrate coating that facilitates aqueous-phase SOA formation. By incorporating the reactive uptake of glyoxal, a key precursor of SOA, into a global model, we significantly improved the model's performance in reproducing supermicron particle contributions to total WSOC observed in the field. Using this improved model, aqueous-phase SOA formed on dust particles over the land contributes to 16% of total SOA and 28% of total aqueous-phase SOA, with levels reaching up to 67% and 74% across the 'dust belt', respectively. These results underscore the important role of aqueous-phase reactions in aged nitrate-containing dust in SOA formation, which should be incorporated into global models to quantify their potential implications for air quality, health, and climate.

Indexed as

aqueous-phase reactionsdust particleshygroscopicitysecondary organic aerosol

Identifiers

PMID40661120
PMCPMC12258144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.