ArticleEplasty2025
Incidental Breast Carcinoma in Reduction Mammoplasty: A Systematic Review.
Article in Eplasty, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Breast reduction is one of the most common plastic surgeries, with more than 40000 procedures performed in the United States annually. As breast reductions remove a portion of the breast and distort the anatomy, plastic surgeons need to be mindful of the possibility of breast cancer. In this study, we sought to review the available literature on breast cancer workup for patients undergoing reduction mammoplasties. Methods: We queried the PubMed (National Institutes of Health) and Embase (Elsevier) databases to identify studies discussing breast cancer workup before breast reduction via preoperative imaging and/or at the time of surgery via histopathologic evaluation of breast specimens. Two individual reviewers screened the titles and abstracts for relevance. We extracted data on the outcomes of preoperative imaging and histopathologic evaluation of breast reduction specimens. Results: Twenty-three articles published between 1996 and 2022 met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Two studies evaluated only the role of preoperative imaging and reported a biopsy rate of 3.7% to 5.1% based on imaging findings. Three studies discussed only the role of histopathologic evaluation without mentioning the preoperative imaging requirements from the patients. For the remaining 18 studies, the rate of incidental breast cancer from breast reduction specimens was 0.0% to 2.0%. All studies recommended universal histopathologic evaluation of breast specimens. Conclusions: In this review, we found unanimous recommendations for performing histopathologic evaluation of breast reduction samples, consistent with the 2022 American Society of Plastic Surgeons clinical practice guideline. Further research is still required to determine the optimal preoperative imaging approach for breast reduction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40661089PMC12257971What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.