ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine-related ocular adverse events in SLE treatment: a real-world disproportionality analysis based on FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS).
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quadrant-Specific Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thinning in Hydroxychloroquine Retinal Toxicity: A Controlled OCT-Based Structural and Exposure Analysis in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Real-world safety profile of givinostat: an early post-marketing pharmacovigilance study based on the FAERS database.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the risk of adverse events associated with chloroquine (CQ) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), using data from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Methods: Disproportionality analysis was conducted using the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR) to detect potential safety signals. Sensitivity analyses were performed to validate these signals, and the time to onset for each Preferred Term (PT) was assessed. Results: Between 2004 and 2024, a total of 2,575 adverse event reports related to HCQ or CQ use in patients with SLE were identified in the FAERS database, of which 437 involved ocular adverse events. The most frequently reported ocular conditions were cataract, macular degeneration, and glaucoma. Disproportionality analysis demonstrated strong associations between HCQ/CQ use and retinal degeneration (ROR = 28.5, 95%CI: 19.94-40.74), cystoid macular oedema (ROR = 12.46, 95%CI: 8.01-19.37), and optic atrophy (ROR = 6.55, 95%CI: 3.51-12.19). Sensitivity analyses, conducted after excluding SLE cases, indicated that all but one event (vitreous floaters) remained statistically significant, suggesting that these risks are more likely attributable to HCQ/CQ exposure than to the underlying disease. The time-to-onset analysis showed that cataract had the shortest average onset time (125.5 days), whereas retinal degeneration had the longest (937.5 days). Conclusion: The extensive clinical use of HCQ and CQ raises significant concerns regarding their ocular safety profile. This study provides real-world pharmacovigilance evidence supporting a substantial risk of ocular adverse events associated with HCQ/CQ use. Further mechanistic and prospective studies are warranted to elucidate the underlying pathophysiological pathways and to confirm these associations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.