ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Exploration of M2 macrophage-related biomarkers and a candidate drug for glioblastoma using high-dimensional weighted gene co-expression network analysis.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- FZD5 drives macrophage-mediated immunomodulation and predicts prognosis in glioma: evidence from single-cell sequencing.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Noninvasive assessment of core metastatic genes in lung adenocarcinoma: development of a predictive model integrating single-cell transcriptomics and radiomics.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Macrophages exhibit diverse activation states. Notably, M2 macrophages, alternatively activated cells, are notably increased within glioblastoma (GBM). Herein, our current study aimed to identify gene biomarkers relevant to M2 macrophages using high-dimensional weighted gene co-expression network analysis (hdWGCNA) and predict a candidate drug for GBM. Methods: Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data (GSE162631) and expression data (GSE4290) for GBM were obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. The Seurat package was used for quality control, processing of scRNA-seq data, and identification of different GBM cell types. Subsequently, the clusterProfiler package was employed to functionally annotate the genes specifically highly expressed in the cells. Notably, genes related to the M2 macrophages were screened by differential expression analysis, and the gene modules were classified by hdWGCNA. Thereafter, a diagnostic model was constructed, and its robustness was tested. Moreover, drug candidates that could bind to the specific genes identified in this study were predicted and further confirmed via molecular docking. Results: Ten cell clusters were classified, with macrophages showing a higher proportion in GBM samples. Moreover, highly expressed genes specific to the M2 macrophages were mainly enriched in neutrophil migration, myeloid leukocyte migration, and chemokine production. A total of 11 gene modules (module 1-11) specific to M2 macrophages were also determined; notably, module 7 showed a relatively high expression of genes. Three key genes, namely, nuclear factor-kappa-B-inhibitor alpha ( Conclusion: The current study revealed the potential gene biomarkers and drug candidate for GBM based on genes related to M2 macrophages, contributing to the understanding of the underlying mechanism of GBM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.