Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40661074›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2025

Orexin-A and motion sickness: a systematic review of animal model studies.

Xu Cai, Long Zhao, Xin Wang, Jiahui Chen, Ying Yuan, Biao Gao, Yanli You

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xu Cai *School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Long Zhao *The 988th Hospital of PLA Joint Logistics Support, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Xin WangSchool of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Jiahui ChenSchool of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Ying YuanSchool of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Biao GaoTeaching and Research Support Center, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Yanli YouSchool of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Sensory input mismatches among the vestibular system, autonomic control, and visual perception cause motion sickness. Anticholinergics and antihistamines are commonly used but have limited efficacy and cause significant side effects. Orexin-A, a hypothalamic neuropeptide, has recently garnered attention for its potential role in controlling motion sickness. Objective: To summarize current knowledge on the effects and mechanisms of orexin-A in reducing motion sickness, identify gaps, and propose future research directions. Methods: Five qualified animal experiments were identified after searching PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Embase, and WoS. The SYRCLE tool was used to evaluate study quality, followed by a qualitative synthesis. Results: Orexin-A reduced motion-induced behavioral abnormalities, nausea, and vomiting in rat and cat models. These benefits are likely mediated by the modulation of hypothalamic nuclei activity, enhanced stomach motility, and improved vestibular function. However, several limitations were observed, including inadequate reporting on randomization, blinding, and allocation concealment, as well as heterogeneity in interventions and outcome measures. Conclusion: Animal model studies indicates that orexin-A mitigates motion sickness (MS) symptoms in animal models, but overall certainty is low to moderate owing to risk of bias and indirectness. Rigorous, blinded studies with standardized outcomes-and ultimately, early-phase clinical trials, are needed to clarify therapeutic potential.

Indexed as

motion sicknessneural mechanismsorexin-Asystematic reviewtherapeutic potential

Identifiers

PMID40661074
PMCPMC12256435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.