ReviewFrontiers in health services2025
Concurrent use and association of patient-reported experience and outcome measures in psychiatric and substance use disorder care: a scoping review.
Review in Frontiers in health services, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Building consensus on the core clinical competencies and outcomes related to effective child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS) crisis team provision: findings from a Delphi study.BMJ mental health · 2026Article
- Psychometric performance of the WHO-5 well-being index in a nationwide sample of inpatients discharged from specialised mental health care.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patient reported experience measures (PREMs) provide patients` perspectives on health care services received, while generic Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) reflect their subjective well-being or quality of life. The relationship between these measures is not well understood. Aims: To assess concurrent use and relationship of PREMs and PROMs In psychiatric and substance use disorder care, to inform how they best can be used concurrently in measuring quality of care from the patient perspective. Methods: Scoping review following Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines and adhering to the PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews. Searches were carried out in Medline, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane database of systematic reviews, Embase, and APA PsycInfo. Two researchers independently screened all articles published in English or Scandinavian languages and extracted information using a pre-defined template. Refence lists of included articles were screened for additional studies. Results: Four articles were included, three from psychiatric care and one from substance use disorder treatment. Four different PREMs measures and three generic PROMs measures were used. Each study found PREMs measures to be associated with generic PROMs, but the strength of the associations varied from weak to strong. Conclusion: Existing studies suggest that patient reported experiences are related to quality of life and well-being among patients in psychiatric and substance use disorder care. This study highlights a critical gap in the understanding of how PREMs and PROMs may interact in these patient populations. Despite limited research on their concurrent use, our findings offer preliminary insights into their potential to support patient-centred care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.