Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40660983›Full record

ArticleZhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology2025

[Expert opinions on the technical guiding principles for clinical trials of drugs in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection].

Author Group of Expert Opinions

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Author Group of Expert Opinions

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2022YFC2303600
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains one of the major public health challenges facing our country. There are approximately seventy-five million chronic HBV-infected cases in our country, according to the latest epidemiological data. Current first-line antiviral drugs, including nucleos(t)ide analogs and interferons, can effectively suppress viral replication and delay disease progression, but they still struggle to provide a functional cure for chronic hepatitis B or completely eliminate HBV infection. This unmet clinical need has become the core driving force behind the development of new antiviral drugs for chronic HBV infection. In recent years, China's drug regulatory policy reform has continued to deepen, and the indications for antiviral treatment of HBV infection have been continuously broadened, creating a more favorable policy environment for innovative drug research and development. In this context, global drug development for HBV, especially in China, is accelerating, and new drugs with various mechanisms of action are entering the clinical research phase. In order to standardize and guide the rational design, efficient implementation, and accurate evaluation of clinical trials of new antiviral drugs for the treatment of chronic HBV infection, the expert group combined the latest research progress and clinical practice experience at home and abroad to systematically update key issues such as the research endpoints of clinical trials of new antiviral drugs, aiming to provide authoritative and practical technical guidance for new drug research and development.

Indexed as

Antiviral AgentsClinical Trials as TopicHepatitis B, ChronicChinaDrug DevelopmentHepatitis B virusHumansAntiviral Agents

Identifiers

PMID40660983
PMCPMC12869174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.