ArticleMedical physics2025
Preserving noise texture through training data curation for deep learning denoising of high-resolution cardiac EID-CT.
Article in Medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo utilize high spatial resolution reconstructions for cardiac imaging at energy-integrating detector CT (EID)-CT with comparable noise to similar reconstructions at photon-counting detector (PCD)-CT, methods to control EID-CT image noise are needed. Supervised convolutional neural networks (CNN) have shown promise for denoising, but a challenge remains to efficiently create high-quality and unbiased estimates of noise without access to dedicated software or proprietary information, such that natural noise texture is retained in CNN-denoised CT images. PURPOSE: This study aims to develop and test image-based noise estimation methods that can be used to train a CNN model, and to evaluate denoising performance and noise texture preservation for EID-CT coronary CT angiography (cCTA) images reconstructed with high-resolution kernels.
methodsU-net CNN models were trained for denoising. To supervise training, noise-only images were estimated directly from high-resolution kernel (Bv59) reconstructed EID-CT (HR EID-CT) patient images using two different methods: subtraction of low- and high-strength iterative reconstruction (IR); subtraction of adjacent image slices with the same IR strength. The noise estimates from these methods contain differing noise texture and anatomical information. Networks were trained and validated separately for three data sets: the training data from each of the two noise-estimation methods, and a 50%-50% partition of training data between the two methods. The trained models were applied to two sets of testing data: CT images of a uniform water phantom to measure noise power spectra (NPS), and an independent cohort of seven patient cCTA HR EID-CT exams. The denoised patient images were compared to standard resolution EID-CT reconstructions (Bv40). As a low-noise reference, patient images acquired on the same day with a PCD-CT and reconstructed using a similar kernel as HR EID-CT were used for comparison.
resultsModels trained with each noise-image estimation method denoised the HR EID-CT images by 74%-79% to achieve a comparable noise magnitude to the HR PCD-CT images. The peak, average, and 10% peak frequencies of the NPS of the input images (6.08, 6.24, and 12.0 cm
conclusionsThe noise texture and anatomical accuracy in CT images denoised with an image-based supervised CNN are greatly influenced by the characteristics and partitioning of training data. With higher-resolution reconstructions and noise texture-preserving deep learning denoising, the quality of cCTA images from EID-CT can be enhanced to enable resolvability of subtle anatomy similar to PCD-CT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.