ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2025
CT Imaging-based radiomics predicts the pain relief of Strontium-89 in treating tumor-induced bone metastases.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A CT-based radiomics model for predicting pain relief after radiotherapy in patients with bone metastases: a dual-center study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBone metastasis is a common complication in advanced malignancies, often resulting in severe pain and reduced quality of life. Radiopharmaceuticals like Strontium-89 (
methodsThe study analyzed clinical and imaging data from 146 patients with bone metastases, specifically focusing on two types of lesions: osteolytic and osteoblastic. Pain relief was assessed by the step of the WHO pain ladder required for pain relief, along with a reduction in opioid dosage, indicating effective pain management. Based on exploratory analysis, a Bagging Decision Tree machine learning model was selected for outcome prediction in osteolytic lesions, while the XGBoost model was utilized for osteoblastic lesions. Both models leveraged radiomics features extracted from these lesions to improve predictive accuracy. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), along with sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and calibration curves.
resultsThe pain relief rate for osteolytic metastases was 58.33%, and for osteoblastic metastases, it was 62.16%. The Bagging Decision Tree model achieved an AUC of 0.991 in the training set and 0.889 in the test set for osteolytic lesions. For osteoblastic lesions, the XGBoost model yielded robust results, with an AUC of 0.970 in the training set and 0.958 in the test set.
conclusionThis study shows promise in predicting pain relief outcomes of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.