ArticleJournal of cerebrovascular and endovascular neurosurgery2025
The efficacy and safety of stent-assisted coil embolization with the semi-jailing technique in patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysm.
Article in Journal of cerebrovascular and endovascular neurosurgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Neuroform atlas versus LVIS-assisted coil embolization of wide-neck intracranial aneurysms: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe stent-assisted coiling (SAC) is a well-known procedure for wide neck intracranial aneurysms. To date, the impact of the semi-jailing technique (SJT) on outcomes in patients with SAC remains unknown. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SAC using open- or closed-cell stents in patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms.
methodsThe data of patients treated with SAC between December 2013 and May 2022 was retrospectively investigated. Clinical, aneurysmal, outcomes were compared between patients with and without SJT. The primary outcome was 1-year complete occlusion defined as the Raymond-Roy occlusion classification class I. Safety outcomes included permanent deficits and mortality. Subgroup analysis was also performed regarding open-cell or closed-cell stents.
resultsAmong 320 patients with SAC, 220 patients undertook SJT (68.8%). The median age of patients was 61.0 years (interquartile range, 50.3-71.0 years) and 73 were male (22.8%). 1-year complete occlusion was obtained in 221 patients (69.1%). Permanent deficits and mortality were observed in 3 (0.9%) and 1 (0.3%) patient, respectively. Compared to non-SJT, SJT was significantly related to 1-year complete occlusion (73.2% vs. 60.0%, adjusted odds ratio 1.85, 95% confidence interval 1.11-3.09, p=0.02). Safety outcomes showed no significant difference between SJT and non-SJT. Conclusions: The results of this study showed the efficacy and safety of SJT in unruptured intracranial aneurysm patients treated with SAC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.