Trial reportESC heart failure2025
Efficacy of ambulatory intravenous diuresis for chronic heart failure patients: Insights from the DEA-HF trial.
Trial report in ESC heart failure, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Kidney function and acid-base status as gatekeepers of natriuretic and diuretic responsiveness in chronic HF: insights from the DEA-HF clinical trial.European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy · 2026Trial
- Efficacy of ambulatory intravenous diuresis for chronic heart failure patients: Insights from the DEA-HF trial.ESC heart failure · 2025Trial
- Advances in Cardiorenal Medicine: The Year 2025 in Review.Cardiorenal medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsOral diuretic treatment has limited efficacy in managing chronic heart failure (HF) patients. Novel strategies are needed to manage patients with refractory congestion despite optimal HF therapy and high-dose oral diuretic treatment. In the present study, we prospectively quantified the efficacy and safety of an ambulatory, weekly, high-dose parenteral diuresis strategy. METHODS AND
resultsData from the prospective, randomized, cross-over controlled study for comparisons of diuresis efficacy in HF patients (DEA-HF) were analysed. Chronic HF patients with congestion despite guideline-directed medical therapy were enrolled to receive three high-intensity diuretic regimens, once a week, in a randomized order: intravenous (IV) furosemide 250 mg; IV furosemide 250 mg + oral metolazone 5 mg; and IV furosemide 250 mg + IV acetazolamide 500 mg. The primary outcome compared the total sodium excretion following each diuretic regimen. Here, all regimens were pooled to assess the effect of weekly intensive diuresis approach on congestion parameters. The study population included 42 patients, 40% females, with a mean age of 72 ± 9 years. Following three consecutive weekly treatments, the mean body weight was decreased from 85.5 kg [95% confidence interval (CI): 79.7-91.2] to 83.1 kg (95% CI: 77.4-88.9. P = 0.0005), accompanied by a significant decrease in congestion score, N-terminal-pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels and lung ultrasound B-line count. Serum creatinine mildly but significantly increased from 1.81 mg/dL (95% CI: 1.62-2.01) to 2.01 mg/dL (95% CI: 1.81-2.21. P < 0.001), and no hospitalizations due to acute kidney injury occurred.
conclusionsIn patients with congestion-refractory HF, an ambulatory strategy utilizing high-intensity weekly IV diuretic therapy achieved effective decongestion without major safety concerns. This escalated strategy may improve clinical outcomes and prevent hospitalizations of chronic HF patients who require diuresis intensification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.