Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40660815›Full record

ReviewJournal of experimental botany2025

Beyond the boundary: a new road to improve photosynthesis via wind.

Killian Dupont, Tomas E van Den Berg, Jiayu Zhang, Arnold F Moene, Silvère R M Vialet-Chabrand

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of experimental botany, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Killian DupontHorticulture and Product Physiology (HPP), Wageningen University, P.O. Box 16, Wageningen 6700 AA, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0000-4260-1849
Tomas E van Den BergHorticulture and Product Physiology (HPP), Wageningen University, P.O. Box 16, Wageningen 6700 AA, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7202-4699
Jiayu ZhangHorticulture and Product Physiology (HPP), Wageningen University, P.O. Box 16, Wageningen 6700 AA, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0009-5585-0049
Arnold F MoeneMeteorology & Air Quality Group (MAQ), Wageningen University, P.O. Box 47, Wageningen 6700 AA, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3614-8544
Silvère R M Vialet-ChabrandHorticulture and Product Physiology (HPP), Wageningen University, P.O. Box 16, Wageningen 6700 AA, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2105-2825

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plants interact with their microclimate, simultaneously responding to and influencing it. A key element in this interaction is the leaf boundary layer: a stagnant air layer enveloping the leaf, creating a resistance to heat and gas exchange. Its thickness, altered mainly by airflow and leaf morphology, determines the leaf-to-air interaction. Field crops experience wind speeds of 0-8 m s-1 at the canopy top, with wind gusts up to 20 m s-1, but wind speeds drop significantly within the canopy, creating localized low-airflow conditions. Conversely, indoor-grown crops always encounter low wind speeds (0-1 m s-1) and these, especially with larger leaves, restrict heat and gas exchange, impacting photosynthesis and transpiration. Although the effect of the leaf boundary layer on plant exchange processes has been defined, its magnitude remains poorly characterized and is frequently underestimated. This review re-examines its role, and underlying processes are further explained by using an existing modelling approach informed by published physiological parameters from relevant crops. This model suggests that in greenhouses, increases in wind speed typically smaller than 0.2 m s-1 could boost diurnal photosynthesis by 10-20%, although with possible detrimental side-effects such as growth reductions due to mechanical effects and excessive transpiration. In the field, leaves within the canopy often experience thick boundary layers (conductance <0.5 mol m-2 s-1). The role of the boundary layer needs to be re-evaluated, but this will require new tools, methods, and models to make a breakthrough in understanding this overlooked process in both field and controlled-environment agriculture crops.

Indexed as

Crops, AgriculturalPhotosynthesisPlant LeavesWindPlant TranspirationAirflowcontrolled-environment agriculture (CEA)gas exchangeheat exchangeleaf boundary layerleaf sizemicroclimatic gradientphotosynthesisstomatal conductancetranspirationwind

Identifiers

PMID40660815
PMCPMC12621100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.