Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40660812›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2025

ICD lead and primary metal artifact detection and inpainting in cardiac CT images.

Trevor McKeown, H Michael Gach, Yao Hao, Hongyu An, Clifford G Robinson, Phillip S Cuculich, Deshan Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Trevor McKeownMedical Physics Program, Duke University, North Carolina, USA.
H Michael GachDepartment of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Washington University, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA.
Yao HaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Washington University, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA.
Hongyu AnDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, Washington University, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA.
Clifford G RobinsonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Washington University, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA.
Phillip S CuculichDepartment of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Washington University, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA.
Deshan YangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

Novel imaging and treatment technologies for image-guided noninvasive stereotactic cardiac radiosurgeryR01HL148210 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GACH, H MICHAEL, YANG, DESHAN · 2019 to 2022
$1.7M
Develop a large-scale library of comprehensive deformable image registration (DIR) benchmark datasets and an integrated framework for quantifying accuracy of patient-specific DIR resultsR01EB029431 · NIBIB · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI YANG, DESHAN · 2021 to 2021
$1.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL148210NHLBI NIH HHS R01-HL148210NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB029431NIBIB NIH HHS R01-EB029431
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundQuantifying cardiac motion on pre-treatment CT imaging for stereotactic arrhythmia radiotherapy patients is difficult due to image artifacts caused by metal leads of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). The CT scanners' onboard metal artifact reduction tool does not sufficiently reduce these artifacts. More advanced artifact reduction techniques require the raw CT projection data and thus do not apply to already reconstructed CT images. New methods are needed to accurately reduce the primary metal artifacts from ICD leads in already reconstructed CTs to recover the otherwise lost anatomical information. PURPOSE: To develop a methodology to automatically detect the ICD lead wires and surrounding primary metal artifacts in cardiac CT scans and inpaint the affected volume with anatomically consistent structures and values.

methodsBreath-hold ECG-gated 4DCT scans of 12 patients who underwent cardiac radiation therapy for treating ventricular tachycardia were collected. The primary metal artifacts in the images caused by the ICD leads were manually contoured. A 2D U-Net deep learning (DL) model was developed to segment the metal artifacts automatically using eight patients for training, two for validation, and two for testing. A dataset of 592 synthetic CTs was prepared by adding segmented metal artifacts from the patient 4DCT images to artifact-free cardiac CTs of 148 patients. A 3D image inpainting DL model was trained to refill the metal artifact portion in the synthetic images with realistic image contents that approached the ground truth artifact-free images. The trained inpainting model was evaluated by analyzing the automated segmentation results of the four heart chambers with and without artifacts on the synthetic dataset. Additionally, the raw cardiac patient images with metal artifacts were processed using the inpainting model and the results of metal artifact reduction were qualitatively inspected.

resultsThe artifact detection model worked well and produced a Dice score of 0.958 ± 0.008. The inpainting model for synthesized cases was able to recreate images nearly identical to the ground truth with a structural similarity index of 0.988 ± 0.012. With the chamber segmentations on the artifact-free images as the reference, the average surface Dice scores improved from 0.684 ± 0.247 to 0.964 ± 0.067 and the Hausdorff distance reduced from 3.4 ± 3.9 mm to 0.7 ± 0.7 mm. The inpainting model's use on cardiac patient CTs was visually inspected and the artifact-inpainted images were visually plausible.

conclusionWe successfully developed two deep models to detect and inpaint the ICD leads and primary metal artifacts in cardiac CT images. These deep models are useful to improve the heart chamber segmentation and cardiac motion analysis in CT images corrupted by metal artifacts. The trained models and example data are available to the public through GitHub.

Indexed as

ArtifactsDefibrillators, ImplantableFour-Dimensional Computed TomographyHeartImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMetalsDeep LearningHumansMetalsdeep learningmedical image segmentationmetal artifact reduction

Identifiers

PMID40660812
PMCPMC12286698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.