ArticleClinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
Heavy Menstrual Bleeding and Hormonal Therapy in Women with Type 1 von Willebrand Disease Enrolled on the Zimmerman Program.
Article in Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
IntroductionWomen with von Willebrand Disease (VWD) frequently experience heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB), impacting their health and quality of life. Hormonal contraceptives are a standard treatment.AimWe hypothesized that women with type 1 VWD using hormonal therapy would have lower bleeding scores and potentially higher VWF levels than non-users. To test this, we compared demographics, VWF levels, and International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Bleeding Assessment Tool (ISTH-BAT) scores between hormone users and non-users in the Zimmerman Program cohort.MethodsData from 269 women with type 1 VWD enrolled in the Zimmerman Program were analyzed. Of these, 103 were hormone users, including oral contraceptives (71), medroxyprogesterone acetate (11), levonorgestrel IUD (11), contraceptive implant (3), and the etonogestrel/ethinyl estradiol vaginal ring (1) and (6) subjects were undergoing hormone replacement therapy. Participants who were postmenopausal were excluded from the study results.ResultsHMB was reported by 252 out of 269 participants (94%), with 118 (47%) reporting severe symptoms. While hormone users were younger than non-users, 22.3 versus 23.2 years, (p = .003), VWF levels were similar between groups, (0.36 vs 0.38IU/mL). Age-adjusted BAT scores revealed that in all age groups, more than 70% of patients had abnormal bleeding scores.ConclusionHormonal therapy users had lower total BAT scores compared to non-users, though differences were not statistically significant. These findings suggest a potential but limited effect of hormone use on bleeding phenotype in women with type 1 VWD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.