ArticleClinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology2025
The Association between Intranasal Esketamine and Treatment-emergent Insomnia in the Treatment of Treatment-resistant Major Depression: A Meta-analysis.
Article in Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Rapid-acting NMDA and GABAergic Modulators in Mood Disorders: From Synaptic Mechanisms to Clinical Practice.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Intranasal (IN) esketamine represents a novel add-on treatment for treatment-resistant depression (TRD) with reported favourable effects on insomnia. IN esketamine treatment might similarly reduce the incidence of insomnia as an adverse event (AE). The present meta-analysis therefore investigated whether IN esketamine relative to placebo is associated with a lower incidence of insomnia as an AE in adults with TRD. Methods: Data were retrieved from seven randomised placebo-controlled trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of IN esketamine combined with a monoaminergic antidepressant in the treatment of TRD that reported data on insomnia as an AE. The study population (n = 1,311) comprised adult patients (aged ≥ 18 years) with a primary diagnosis of major depressive disorder. A mixed-effects logistic regression model was employed to compare the incidence of insomnia as an AE between the IN esketamine and placebo group. Results: Insomnia as an AE was reported by 52 patients (7.3%) in the IN esketamine group relative to 40 (6.7%) in the placebo group. IN esketamine compared to placebo was not associated with the odds of insomnia as an AE (OR = 1.07; 95% CI = 0.68-1.69; Conclusion: IN esketamine does not affect the occurrence of insomnia as an AE in the treatment of TRD. This contrasts previous findings demonstrating beneficial effects of esketamine on insomnia severity relative to placebo, although AE reporting may not capture insomnia improvements in a population with frequent baseline insomnia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.