ReviewClinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology2025
Effectiveness of fMRI-based Neurofeedback Therapy on Depression: A Systematic Review.
Review in Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeting the dopaminergic midbrain with precision 7-Tesla biofeedback training in depression: A proof-of-principle randomized controlled trial.Molecular psychiatry · 2026Article
- Advances in the Application of Brain-Computer Interface-Based Neurofeedback Training in the Rehabilitation of Patients with Major Depressive Disorder.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2026Review
- Subjective regulation success mediates the influence of neurofeedback performance on mood in the absence of training effects.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This systematic review explores the efficacy of fMRI-based neurofeedback as an alternative treatment for individuals with depression who do not respond well to traditional therapies. Methods: A comprehensive literature search across several databases (PubMed, Web of Science, ProQuest, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar) identified 649 articles related to neurofeedback and depression, ultimately including 26 studies after eligibility assessments. Results: The majority of these studies, comprising both open-label and randomized controlled trials, reported significant reductions in depressive symptoms following neurofeedback interventions, which primarily targeted amygdala activity. Eighteen studies showed moderate to large effect sizes (Cohen's d values from 0.38 to 1.50) on validated depression measures. Notably, neurobiological changes were observed, including increased Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent (BOLD) activity and connectivity in emotion regulation regions such as the amygdala and prefrontal cortex. Some studies indicated sustained symptom improvements, with over 75% of patients applying learned strategies in daily life. However, methodological limitations and a moderate to high risk of bias were noted in several studies. Conclusion: fMRI-based neurofeedback presents a promising adjunctive therapy for depression, especially for patients who are resistant to standard treatments. Although current evidence shows positive effects on neural function and clinical outcomes, addressing methodological issues and standardizing study designs is essential. Future research should emphasize larger sample sizes and long-term efficacy while enhancing accessibility and cost-effectiveness in diverse clinical environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.