ArticleMolecular genetics and metabolism2025
Effective algorithm to differentiate NBS MCADD cases from carriers and non-carriers and an assessment of the utility of the second newborn screen for MCADD.
Article in Molecular genetics and metabolism, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
False positives are an inherent part of newborn screening that can increase both costs to the healthcare system and parental anxiety. Previous studies primarily examined presumptive positive rates for medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency (MCADD) in places conducting one newborn screen (NBS), with predominantly white, non-Hispanic subjects. Texas performs two NBSs and there is a majority Hispanic population in our region. This study aims to analyze biochemical and DNA data to more easily distinguish affected individuals from carriers or healthy non-carriers and identify benefits and challenges of a second NBS for MCADD. Biochemical and targeted DNA data from NBS dried blood spots (DBS) were analyzed, alongside diagnostic biochemical and DNA testing. A Kruskal Wallis Test with Dunn's post-test was performed to compare the groups. Significant differences in all analyte values were observed among MCADD, carrier and non-carrier groups, and between carriers and non-p.Lys329Glu homozygous MCADD cases. Many false positives were detected due to low DBS C8 cutoff and the second NBS. An analyte algorithm including DBS C8, plasma acylcarnitine C6, and plasma C8/C10 was identified and discriminated MCADD cases from carrier and non-carrier cases. All cases with MCADD were identified on the first NBS demonstrating limited utility of a second NBS for MCADD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.