Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40660619›Full record

ReviewMicrobial biotechnology2025

Microbes as Teachers: Rethinking Knowledge in the Anthropocene.

Rachel Armstrong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microbial biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Rachel ArmstrongProfessor of Design Driven Construction for Regenerative Architecture, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3516-6815

Funding

European Innovation Council (EIC), Pathfinder Challenges 101114746
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This opinion piece proposes that the environmental crises of our time arise from a failure to recognise the vital role of microbes in sustaining life on Earth, where ecosystems have been shaped for billions of years by microbial processes, including oxygen production, nutrient cycling and climate regulation. Yet the idea that microbes can 'teach' us how to navigate complexity, adapt across scales, and sustain planetary systems is still marginalised in science, policy, and education. A paradigm shift is proposed: microbes must be reframed as active collaborators in solving global challenges. This perspective is grounded in microbial ecology, Indigenous knowledge, and ethical philosophy, advocating for 'learning' through and with microbial life. To institutionalise this transition, policy and educational reforms are urged, centring microbial literacy as a foundation for ecological understanding. By integrating microbial agency into human knowledge systems, societal actions could be realigned with the biochemical and evolutionary logics that have sustained life for millennia. Ultimately, a deeper engagement with microbial knowledge is called for-one that informs a more sustainable future.

Indexed as

MicrobiologyEcosystemHumansanthropocentrismepistemologylearningliteracymicrobesmicrobiomesymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID40660619
PMCPMC12259498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.