Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40660496›Full record

ArticleFEBS open bio2025

Functional parameters of spermatozoa obtained by a new selection device.

Julio C Chávez, Paulina Torres, Gabriela Carrasquel-Martínez, María G Figueroa-Méndez, Diana Flores, Lina Villar, Israel Maldonado, Marcela B Trevino, Claudia Treviño

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FEBS open bio, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Julio C ChávezDepartamento de Genética del Desarrollo y Fisiología Molecular, Instituto de Biotecnología (IBT), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Cuernavaca, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7375-9531
Paulina TorresDepartamento de Genética del Desarrollo y Fisiología Molecular, Instituto de Biotecnología (IBT), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Cuernavaca, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9271-2205
Gabriela Carrasquel-MartínezCITMER, Reproductive Medicine, México City, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5868-1541
María G Figueroa-MéndezCITMER, Reproductive Medicine, México City, Mexico.
Diana FloresCITMER, Reproductive Medicine, México City, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0844-2582
Lina VillarCITMER, Reproductive Medicine, México City, Mexico.
Israel MaldonadoCITMER, Reproductive Medicine, México City, Mexico.
Marcela B TrevinoScience Department, School of Pure and Applied Science, Florida SouthWestern (FSW) State College, Fort Myers, FL, USA.
Claudia TreviñoDepartamento de Genética del Desarrollo y Fisiología Molecular, Instituto de Biotecnología (IBT), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Cuernavaca, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7281-0534

Funding

Programa de Apoyo a Proyectos de Investigación e Innovación Tecnológica (PAPIIT), Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico (DGAPA), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México IN207122Programa de Apoyo a Proyectos de Investigación e Innovación Tecnológica (PAPIIT), Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico (DGAPA), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México IN215425Programa de Apoyo a Proyectos de Investigación e Innovación Tecnológica (PAPIIT), Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico (DGAPA), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México IN218123
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The success of assisted reproduction techniques (ARTs) is based on the selection of gametes with optimal characteristics. This is critical for male gametes, since among the large number of cells present in semen, many may have unnoticeable DNA damage and compromised membrane integrity, among other alterations. In this work, we examined the use of the LensHooke CA0™ device (CA0 chamber) as a promising sperm separation method for ARTs, analyzing both normozoospermic and teratozoospermic samples. Additionally, we compared fertilization rates with IVF and ICSI procedures using Teratozoospermic samples. As reference for comparison, we used the current standard for sperm selection, density gradient centrifugation. Using CA0 chambers and DGC, we obtained comparable sperm recovery numbers, membrane potential (in Normozoospermic samples) and motility parameters. The progesterone-induced intracellular Ca

Indexed as

Cell SeparationSpermatozoaFertilization in VitroHumansMaleReproductive Techniques, AssistedSperm Injections, IntracytoplasmicSperm Motilityparametersseparationspermvalidation

Identifiers

PMID40660496
PMCPMC12401173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.