ReviewProtein and peptide letters2025
Protein and Peptide Therapeutics: Stability Challenges, Regulatory Demands, and Innovative Formulation Solutions for Enhanced Clinical Effectiveness.
Review in Protein and peptide letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Phytochemical Engineering of Alternative Plant Proteins for Enhanced Nutrition and Digestibility.Plant foods for human nutrition (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Proteins and peptides play a crucial role in biological functions and contemporary therapeutic approaches; however, their clinical effectiveness is frequently hindered by swift renal clearance and enzymatic degradation. Peptides possess structured amino acid sequences that facilitate targeted drug delivery and enhance patient adherence. In contrast, proteins demonstrate intricate stability behaviors affected by pH and environmental conditions, requiring careful formulation strategies. Addressing these challenges necessitates a comprehensive understanding of stability and regulatory requirements. Regulatory agencies, including the FDA, EMA, and PMDA, require comprehensive stability testing per guidelines such as ICH Q5C and ICH Q1A(R2). This ensures meticulous management of factors such as temperature control, formulation optimization, and aggregation mitigation. Stability enhancement requires the application of innovative techniques, including protein engineering, lyoprotection, and nanoparticle encapsulation, in conjunction with ongoing quality monitoring. Integrating scientific expertise with regulatory standards enables researchers and pharmaceutical manufacturers to develop safe, effective, and compliant protein and peptide therapeutics for various patient populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40660448What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.