ArticleCurrent medical imaging2025
Noninvasive Evaluation of the Rat Adenomyosis Model Constructed by Autologous Endometrial Implantation using Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Article in Current medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDynamic changes in adenomyotic lesions in animal models have been difficult to observe and evaluate in vivo on a regular basis. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the feasibility of establishing a rat model of adenomyosis through autologous endometrial implantation and to assess the value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for noninvasive evaluation of the model.
methodsForty rats were randomly divided into two groups (20 rats in the control group, 20 rats in the model group). A rat adenomyosis model was constructed through autologous endometrial implantation. Three months after the modeling surgery, the rats underwent MRI examination, including T2-weighted axial imaging and T1-weighted axial imaging. The thickness of the uterine myometrium and junctional zone was measured. Following the MRI, the rat uterus was sliced for hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining.
resultsIn the model group, lesions of adenomyosis were successfully established in all surviving rats. The myometrium of the rat uterus showed uneven thickening accompanied by scattered spotty T2 hypersignal. The junctional zone appeared as a low-signal band between the endometrium with high signal and the myometrium. The average thicknesses of both the myometrium and the junctional zone were significantly greater in the model group compared to the control group, with the differences reaching statistical significance. Ectopic endometrium can lead to hyperplasia of the peripheral muscle cells in the myometrium, which is manifested on T2-weighted images as localized thickening and hypo-intensity of the myometrium interspersed with punctiform hyperintensity. Histologically, regions of low signal intensity refer to hyperplasia of smooth muscle, while bright foci on T2-weighted images correspond to ectopic endometrial tissue and cystic dilation of glands. This study proved the noninvasive evaluation of a rat adenomyosis model and described the junctional zone in rats using MRI techniques. Histological examination using HE staining confirmed a higher nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratio and a more compact cell arrangement in the junctional zone region of rats compared to the outer myometrium, which could explain its hypointensity.
conclusionMRI is a valuable method for evaluating the rat adenomyosis model non-invasively. Furthermore, the successful visualization of the junctional zone in the rat uterus using MRI may have potential applications in further evaluating the progression of adenomyosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.