Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40660307›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025

Reasons for refusing high tibial osteotomy and the impact of virtual reality-based patient education: a prospective single-centre study.

Ekrem Özdemir, Fatih Emre Topsakal, Nasuhi Altay, Yavuz Şahbat, Esra Demirel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ekrem ÖzdemirDepartment of Orthopaedics andTraumatology, Erzurum City Hospital, Erzurum, 25240, Türkiye. e.o.1986@hotmail.com.
Fatih Emre TopsakalDepartment of Orthopaedics andTraumatology, Erzurum City Hospital, Erzurum, 25240, Türkiye.
Nasuhi AltayDepartment of Orthopaedics andTraumatology, Erzurum City Hospital, Erzurum, 25240, Türkiye.
Yavuz ŞahbatDepartment of Orthopaedics andTraumatology, Erzurum City Hospital, Erzurum, 25240, Türkiye.
Esra DemirelDepartment of Orthopaedics andTraumatology, Erzurum City Hospital, Erzurum, 25240, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh tibial osteotomy (HTO) is a well established joint preserving surgical option for young and active patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis. Although clinically effective, the use of this technique remains suboptimal due to a high rate of patient refusal. Understanding the underlying reasons for this reluctance is crucial, as modifiable psychological and informational barriers may be preventing patients from accessing a potentially life-changing procedure.

methodsThis prospective, single-centre study included 235 of 330 patients screened for HTO between January 2020 and December 2024. The study was conducted in three phases. In Phase 1, semi-structured interviews were performed with 125 patients who declined surgery, and thematic analysis was conducted according to age and gender. In Phase 2, a virtual reality (VR)-based educational module was developed based on qualitative findings. In Phase 3, 110 newly recruited patients were randomized into VR (n = 55) and control (n = 55) groups. All participants completed a knowledge test, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and their surgical decision was recorded.

resultsThe 235 patients comprised 30.2% females and 69.8% males, with a mean age of 44.6 years. Female patients most frequently declined surgery due to fear and a preference for non-operative treatments, while male patients cited anesthesia risks and financial concerns. In the VR group, knowledge scores improved by 3.84 points, anxiety decreased by 4.44 points, and surgical acceptance increased to 74.5%, compared to 45.5% in the control group. Knowledge was found to be negatively correlated with anxiety (r = - 0.20) and positively with surgical acceptance (r = + 0.15), while anxiety showed a stronger negative correlation with surgical acceptance (r = - 0.23).

conclusionPatient refusal of HTO is often driven by modifiable factors such as insufficient knowledge, preoperative anxiety, and perceived risks. VR-based education was seen to significantly improve knowledge and acceptance while reducing anxiety, indicating its potential as a powerful tool to enhance informed consent and shared decision-making in orthopaedic surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II - Single-centre, randomized, controlled trial.

Indexed as

Osteoarthritis, KneeOsteotomyPatient Education as TopicTibiaVirtual RealityAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesHigh tibial osteotomyPatient refusalPreoperative anxietySurgical Decision-MakingVirtual Reality-Based education

Identifiers

PMID40660307
PMCPMC12257735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.