ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025
Reasons for refusing high tibial osteotomy and the impact of virtual reality-based patient education: a prospective single-centre study.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in knee osteotomy: evolution of alignment assessment and surgical decision-making.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHigh tibial osteotomy (HTO) is a well established joint preserving surgical option for young and active patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis. Although clinically effective, the use of this technique remains suboptimal due to a high rate of patient refusal. Understanding the underlying reasons for this reluctance is crucial, as modifiable psychological and informational barriers may be preventing patients from accessing a potentially life-changing procedure.
methodsThis prospective, single-centre study included 235 of 330 patients screened for HTO between January 2020 and December 2024. The study was conducted in three phases. In Phase 1, semi-structured interviews were performed with 125 patients who declined surgery, and thematic analysis was conducted according to age and gender. In Phase 2, a virtual reality (VR)-based educational module was developed based on qualitative findings. In Phase 3, 110 newly recruited patients were randomized into VR (n = 55) and control (n = 55) groups. All participants completed a knowledge test, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and their surgical decision was recorded.
resultsThe 235 patients comprised 30.2% females and 69.8% males, with a mean age of 44.6 years. Female patients most frequently declined surgery due to fear and a preference for non-operative treatments, while male patients cited anesthesia risks and financial concerns. In the VR group, knowledge scores improved by 3.84 points, anxiety decreased by 4.44 points, and surgical acceptance increased to 74.5%, compared to 45.5% in the control group. Knowledge was found to be negatively correlated with anxiety (r = - 0.20) and positively with surgical acceptance (r = + 0.15), while anxiety showed a stronger negative correlation with surgical acceptance (r = - 0.23).
conclusionPatient refusal of HTO is often driven by modifiable factors such as insufficient knowledge, preoperative anxiety, and perceived risks. VR-based education was seen to significantly improve knowledge and acceptance while reducing anxiety, indicating its potential as a powerful tool to enhance informed consent and shared decision-making in orthopaedic surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II - Single-centre, randomized, controlled trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.