Observational studyOrphanet journal of rare diseases2025
Impact of body mass index on clinical presentation and prognosis in myasthenia gravis.
Observational study in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe literature lacks consistent information on the correlation between baseline body mass index (BMI), clinical presentation, and prognosis in patients with myasthenia gravis (MG). This observational multicenter prospective cohort study included patients with MG from February 2017 to June 2023, categorizing them by baseline BMI. The primary outcome was the time to generalization of ocular MG. Secondary outcomes included the time to Activities of Daily Living (ADL) response and Minimal Symptom Expression (MSE). Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess the impact of BMI on these outcomes.
resultsOut of 940 MG patients (510 women) included, 524 had a low BMI and 416 had a high BMI, with a median age of 50.00 years. Patients in the high BMI group were significantly older (p < 0.001), had a lower percentage of females (p < 0.001), and had a shorter disease duration (p = 0.014) compared to those with a low BMI. They also had higher rates of ocular onset (p < 0.001), ocular MG classification (p = 0.001), and acetylcholine receptor antibody seropositivity (p = 0.007), but a lower incidence of thymectomy (p = 0.027). During a median follow-up of 33.00 months, the adjusted Cox models revealed that a higher baseline BMI was associated with an increased risk of ocular MG generalization (HR 1.06; 95% CI 1.01-1.11; p = 0.026), but not with ADL response (HR 0.99; 95% CI 0.95-1.04; p = 0.779) or MSE (HR 0.97; 95% CI 0.92-1.02; p = 0.240).
conclusionsA higher baseline BMI was associated with an increased risk of ocular MG generalization but not with ADL response or MSE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.