ArticleJournal of hematology & oncology2025
Development and validation of a prognostic staging system for primary plasma cell leukemia.
Article in Journal of hematology & oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patterns of Progression and Clinical Outcomes After First Progression in Patients With Primary Plasma Cell Leukemia.American journal of hematology · 2026Article
- Development and validation of an integrative 54 biomarker-based risk identification model for multi-cancer in 42,666 individuals: a population-based prospective study to guide advanced screening strategies.Biomarker research · 2025Article
- Plasma Cell Leukemia Update on Immunophenotype, Molecular Characteristics, and Therapy. The Second Part of Plasma Cell Neoplasms with Spreading in the Blood and Tissues.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
35 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe existing risk models for multiple myeloma (MM) are suboptimal for the stratification of patients with primary plasma cell leukemia (pPCL), a rare and peculiar MM. In this study, we aimed to develop a staging system for pPCL defined as the presence of ≥ 5% circulating plasma cells (CPC) according to the new diagnostic criteria, utilizing one of the largest series of patients with pPCL.
methodsThis multicenter retrospective study included 340 patients with pPCL (the training cohort) from 25 centers nationwide in China. The prognostic impact of baseline characteristics and cytogenetic abnormalities was evaluated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify variables predicting overall survival (OS) to develop a staging system. Its performance was then validated in an independent cohort (n = 80). Genome-wide DNA and RNA sequencing were performed to explore the molecular basis for inter-stage clinical heterogeneity.
resultsDel(17p), t(4;14), and t(14;16), but not 1q+, were verified as high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (HRCAs) of pPCL. HRCA, elevated LDH, and thrombocytopenia had the highest impact on OS and were used to create a simple algorithm, stratifying patients with pPCL into stages I, II, and III, with median OS of 54.1, 24.0, and 5.4 months (II vs. I: HR, 1.986; 95% CI, 1.034-3.814; P = 0.0394; III vs. II: HR, 3.206; 95% CI, 1.757-5.852; P = 0.0001) in the training cohort and 62.1, 31.6, and 21.8 months (II vs. I: HR, 2.013; 95% CI, 0.954-4.251; P = 0.0664; III vs. II: HR, 2.694; 95% CI, 1.136-6.392; P = 0.0245) in the independent validation cohort. The accuracy (c-index 0.711) was higher than other models. Moreover, patients with different stages had highly diverse genomic and transcriptomic aberrations.
conclusionsWe propose a pPCL-specific staging system based on LDH, thrombocytopenia, and cytogenetic abnormalities, which warrants further validation, particularly in a prospective setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.