SynthesisItalian journal of pediatrics2025
A systematic study of emergency strategies for skin healing after pediatric burns: a comprehensive review and a multidisciplinary perspective.
Synthesis in Italian journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Burn injuries are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in pediatric populations. Our study aims to provide an in-depth overview of the current emergency treatment strategies for dermal injuries in children. While advances in burn care have led to improved outcomes for patients with dermal injuries, there remains considerable variability in treatment approaches, and numerous opportunities exist to enhance patient care through the adoption of novel therapies and more effective management of healthcare resources. Children with severe burns often experience profound physiological changes that can result in a range of complications, including infections, fluid and metabolism imbalance due to increased catabolism and protein requirements. Our systematic review focuses on emergency treatment approaches that have demonstrated direct application in pediatric burn care. To this aim, we consulted the scientific databases PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, selecting n = 6 studies that outline the emergency therapeutic approach used in the pediatric setting after a burn, highlighting the most widely adopted techniques and their clinical applications. Study selection was guided by defined eligibility criteria; only original articles published in English that investigated emergency interventions in pediatric populations (0 to 17 years) were considered. Studies were excluded if they involved subjects over 17 years of age, focused on conditions unrelated to burns, employed in vitro or in vivo models, or were review articles. Through a comprehensive examination of these approaches, our study aims to identify areas for improvement and potential advancements in pediatric burn management, suggesting possible future approaches based on Advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) storage approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.