Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40660227›Full record

Trial reportWorld journal of surgical oncology2025

Impairment of neck and shoulder function after neck dissection: a comparative study of goniometry, EMG and paper pencil tool in a randomized controlled trial of level IIb preserving verses conventional neck dissection.

Senniappan Karthikeyan, Deepika Joshi, Abhishek Pathak, Manoj Pandey

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in World journal of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Effects of structured rehabilitation training on shoulder syndrome after cervical lymph neck dissection in patients with oral cancer].Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2026
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Senniappan KarthikeyanDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 221005, India.
Deepika JoshiDepartment of Neurology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 221005, India.
Abhishek PathakDepartment of Neurology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 221005, India.
Manoj PandeyDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 221005, India. mpandey66@bhu.ac.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurgical management of oral cancer poses significant challenges due to the proximity of critical nerves, like spinal accessory, which increases the risk of inadvertent damage or neuropraxia during surgery.

methodsA randomized controlled trial enrolled 32 patients with histologically confirmed oral cavity carcinoma and clinically and radiologically negative cervical neck nodes. Patients were assigned to either level IIb-preserving or conventional selective neck dissection. Shoulder function was evaluated using goniometry, electromyography (EMG), and the Neck Dissection Impairment Index (NDII). Outcomes from these three assessment methods were compared.

resultsBoth groups exhibited impaired spinal accessory nerve function. In the IIb-preserving group, EMG detected impairment in 50% of patients, compared to 95% in the control group. Statistically significant differences were observed between groups across all three assessment methods. However, EMG and goniometry indicated functional recovery at 6 and 12 months, whereas NDII scores remained significantly different at 12 months, despite full nerve recovery observed on EMG and goniometry.

conclusionsThe study demonstrates agreement between shoulder function measurements (goniometry and EMG) but discordance with NDII. This discrepancy may arise from the distinct constructs used by NDII to assess neck dissection impairment, highlighting potential limitations in its sensitivity to functional recovery.

Indexed as

Arthrometry, ArticularElectromyographyMouth NeoplasmsNeckNeck DissectionOrgan Sparing TreatmentsShoulderAdultAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRange of Motion, Articular

Identifiers

PMID40660227
PMCPMC12261729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.