ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025
Advancing shock prediction: leveraging prior knowledge and self-controlled data for enhanced model accuracy and generalizability.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTimely intervention in shock is vital, as delays over one hour greatly increase mortality. This study aims to develop an enhanced machine learning model that improves predictive performance by utilizing self-controlled data and applying feature engineering informed by medical knowledge to physiological waveforms, enabling the prediction of shock one hour in advance without relying on blood tests.
methodsPatient data and physiological waveforms were obtained from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III (MIMIC-3) database. Shock was defined as a mean arterial pressure ≤ 65 mmHg for more than one minute, combined with serum lactate levels ≥ 2 mmol/L within 12 h before or after the hypotension event. Waveforms used for prediction were extracted from 30 min time-segment before a 1-hour period prior to the event. Self-controlled waveforms were obtained from the same patient either one day before or up to seven days after the shock event.
resultsThe study included 389 ICU patients who met the shock criteria and had complete physiological waveform data available for analysis. A total of 299 features were derived: 90 from arterial blood pressure (ABP), 89 from electrocardiogram (ECG), 112 from respiratory waveforms (RESP), and 8 from blood oxygen saturation (SpO
conclusionsThis study demonstrated the feasibility of predicting shock one hour before its onset using only four physiological waveforms, combined with feature engineering based on physiological concepts and self-sampling data. The model achieved a strong AUC and a high sensitivity. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.