Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40660172›Full record

ArticleBMC complementary medicine and therapies2025

The antibacterial properties of Ampelocissus latifolia root extract against Bacillus anthracis.

Khushbu Khushbu, Kamal Kishor Rajak, Sonika Sonika, Saurabh Mishra, Shashikala Verma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC complementary medicine and therapies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Khushbu KhushbuCentre of Experimental Medicine and Surgery, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 221005, UP, India.
Kamal Kishor RajakDepartment of Medical Laboratory Technology, Institute of Paramedical Science , Bapubhai Desaibhai Patel, Charotar University of Science and Technology, Changa, 388421, Gujrat, India.
Sonika SonikaCentre of Experimental Medicine and Surgery, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 221005, UP, India.
Saurabh MishraDepartment of Microbiology, School of Basic Science, Central University of Punjab, Bathinda, 151401, Punjab, India.
Shashikala VermaCentre of Experimental Medicine and Surgery, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 221005, UP, India. shashikalaverma1@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBacillus anthracis a spore-forming Gram-positive bacterium, is the causative agent of anthrax in both animals and humans. The potential emergence of antibiotic-resistant strains of B. anthracis further poses a significant concern. The present study aims to evaluate the antibacterial activity of the methanolic root extract (MRE) of Ampelocissus latifolia against B. anthracis.

methodsThe anti-B. anthracis activity of the MRE was evaluated using the agar well diffusion assay (AWDA), while the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined by the broth dilution method. MRE-induced bacterial cell death was further assessed through fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry. Disruption of the bacterial cell wall by MRE was visualized using Gram staining and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The thermal stability of MRE activity was examined by AWDA across different temperatures. Additionally, the interaction between MRE and antibiotics approved for anthrax treatment was investigated using the checkerboard assay. The in vitro cytotoxicity of MRE was assessed using the MTT assay.

resultsOur findings demonstrate that MRE exhibits potent antibacterial activity against B. anthracis, with a MIC of 0.078 mg/mL. The antibacterial effect of MRE is mediated through disruption of the bacterial cell wall integrity, resulting in leakage of intracellular contents and subsequent cell death. Notably, MRE retains its antibacterial activity even after prolonged exposure to elevated temperatures, indicating good thermal stability. Interaction studies revealed that MRE does not exhibit any antagonistic effects when combined with antibiotics approved for anthrax treatment; moreover, it shows a synergistic enhancement of streptomycin efficacy. Importantly, MRE demonstrated low cytotoxicity, highlighting its potential as a safe antibacterial agent. Additionally, it exhibits broad-spectrum efficacy against Gram-positive and acid-fast bacteria, while showing limited or no activity against Gram-negative bacteria.

conclusionOverall, MRE demonstrates potent antibacterial activity against B. anthracis. It could be particularly useful in treating cutaneous anthrax, where topical application of the extract might be effective. Moreover, MRE could serve as a natural disinfectant for B. anthracis-contaminated sites. Further research into the bioactive compounds present in the extract may lead to the development of new therapeutic agents for anthrax treatment.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacillus anthracisPlant ExtractsHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPlant RootsAnti-Bacterial AgentsPlant ExtractsAmpelocissus latifoliaAnthraxAntibacterial activityBacillus anthracisCytotoxicityMethanolic root extractTraditional medicine

Identifiers

PMID40660172
PMCPMC12261746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.