Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40660130›Full record

ArticleBMC emergency medicine2025

Traumatic brain injuries in a district level emergency department in Cape Town: describing patients' journey from arrival to CT scan and neurosurgery.

Mignon du Toit, Daniël J van Hoving, Abigael Tamba, Ryan Mark O'Meara, Clint Hendrikse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mignon du ToitDivision of Emergency Medicine, Department of Family and Emergency Medicine, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa. dutoitmignon@gmail.com.
Daniël J van HovingDivision of Emergency Medicine, Department of Family and Emergency Medicine, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
Abigael TambaDivision of Emergency Medicine, Department of Family, Community and Emergency Care, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Ryan Mark O'MearaDivision of Emergency Medicine, Department of Family, Community and Emergency Care, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Clint HendrikseDivision of Emergency Medicine, Department of Family, Community and Emergency Care, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnnually, 69 million people worldwide suffer a traumatic brain injury (TBI) with a disproportionately high prevalence of 500 to 800 per 100 000 population in low- and middle-income countries. Delays to accessing CT scan and neurosurgical services are associated with worse outcomes. This study describes the pathway from injury to CT scan and neurosurgery of patients with TBIs that presented to a district level emergency department (ED) in Cape Town.

methodsThis was a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of patients presenting to a district level hospital in Cape Town and data were collected from existing databases and registries. All adult patients (≥ 13 years) who presented to the ED from 01 July 2021 till 30 June 2022 (12 months) with a suspected TBI and had a CT brain were eligible for inclusion. The description of the care pathway involved transfers to the nearby tertiary facility to access after-hour CT scan and neurosurgical services via interfacility transfers, as well as a description of emergency medical services (EMS) mission times for primary calls.

resultsA total of 564 participants with TBIs were included in the final sample: n = 462 (82%) mild (GCS 13–15), n = 52 (9%) moderate (GCS 9–12) and n = 50 (9%) severe (GCS 3–8). Interpersonal violence accounted for more than half of injuries (n = 311, 55%), followed by traffic-related crashes (n = 115, 20%). For moderate and severe TBI, the median door-to-CT-scan time were 12 h and 9 h respectively, and door-to-neurosurgery time were 28 h and 20 h respectively. More than half (n = 305, 54%) of the CT scans were performed at the district facility, despite 73% (n = 410) of participants presenting outside of office hours. EMS transferred more than half (n = 302, 54%) of participants between the district and tertiary facilities.

conclusionThis study provides an understanding of patient journeys and pathway to access CT scan and neurosurgical services. Door-to-CT-scan time is much longer than what evidence suggest and relies heavily on interfacility transfers to access services. In particular, the pathway of the mild TBI cohort may require revision from a contextual best practice and limited resources point of view. CLINICAL TRIAL: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticEmergency Service, HospitalNeurosurgeryNeurosurgical ProceduresTime-to-TreatmentTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEmergency Room VisitsFemaleHospitals, DistrictHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient TransferEmergency medicineHead injuryLow-and middle-income countriesTraumaTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID40660130
PMCPMC12261671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.