ArticleBMC emergency medicine2025
Traumatic brain injuries in a district level emergency department in Cape Town: describing patients' journey from arrival to CT scan and neurosurgery.
Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Timely access to computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in acute critical conditions: clinical and health system outcomes. A scoping review.Emergency radiology · 2026Article
- Early and safer triage in elderly traumatic brain injury using a portable NIRS - based device: clinical evaluation of CEREBOEmergency radiology · 2026Article
- Epidemiology of traumatic brain injury in a South African major trauma cohort.Journal of global health · 2026Observational
- Association between health system navigation factors and preventable trauma mortality in Western Cape, South Africa.International journal of emergency medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnnually, 69 million people worldwide suffer a traumatic brain injury (TBI) with a disproportionately high prevalence of 500 to 800 per 100 000 population in low- and middle-income countries. Delays to accessing CT scan and neurosurgical services are associated with worse outcomes. This study describes the pathway from injury to CT scan and neurosurgery of patients with TBIs that presented to a district level emergency department (ED) in Cape Town.
methodsThis was a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of patients presenting to a district level hospital in Cape Town and data were collected from existing databases and registries. All adult patients (≥ 13 years) who presented to the ED from 01 July 2021 till 30 June 2022 (12 months) with a suspected TBI and had a CT brain were eligible for inclusion. The description of the care pathway involved transfers to the nearby tertiary facility to access after-hour CT scan and neurosurgical services via interfacility transfers, as well as a description of emergency medical services (EMS) mission times for primary calls.
resultsA total of 564 participants with TBIs were included in the final sample: n = 462 (82%) mild (GCS 13–15), n = 52 (9%) moderate (GCS 9–12) and n = 50 (9%) severe (GCS 3–8). Interpersonal violence accounted for more than half of injuries (n = 311, 55%), followed by traffic-related crashes (n = 115, 20%). For moderate and severe TBI, the median door-to-CT-scan time were 12 h and 9 h respectively, and door-to-neurosurgery time were 28 h and 20 h respectively. More than half (n = 305, 54%) of the CT scans were performed at the district facility, despite 73% (n = 410) of participants presenting outside of office hours. EMS transferred more than half (n = 302, 54%) of participants between the district and tertiary facilities.
conclusionThis study provides an understanding of patient journeys and pathway to access CT scan and neurosurgical services. Door-to-CT-scan time is much longer than what evidence suggest and relies heavily on interfacility transfers to access services. In particular, the pathway of the mild TBI cohort may require revision from a contextual best practice and limited resources point of view. CLINICAL TRIAL: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.