ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2025
Genetic parameters and potential of reducing tail and ear damage in pigs through breeding.
Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEar and tail biting are behaviours in pigs that cause both welfare problems and financial losses. Data collection of behaviour is difficult at the large scale needed for breeding. The damage inflicted on victims can, however, serve as a proxy for animal breeding. Here, we analysed tail and ear damage scores on their original scale, binary scale, and summed versions of these damage traits to investigate which trait definition is best for genetic selection. Using data from six purebred lines (33,329 animals in total) we aimed to (1) estimate genetic parameters for ear and tail damage using direct genetic models, (2) estimate the genetic correlation between tail and ear damage, (3) compare different trait definitions and their impact on accuracy, dispersion, and bias of estimated breeding values (EBV), and (4) compare expected responses to selection for each trait definition.
resultsThe heritability of the damage traits ranged from 0.04 to 0.06. Ear and tail damage were moderately correlated (0.41-0.45), meaning that the genetic propensity of being a victim is a different trait for tail versus ear biting. Estimates of the accuracy of the EBV for the traits with a five-fold cross-validation and the linear regression method based on pedigree relationships ranged from 0.27 to 0.57, the dispersion from 0.91 to 1.18, and the bias was negligible. With a selected proportion of 5%, genetic progress of ~ 0.20-0.78 genetic standard deviations per generation can be reached, depending on the trait. It was trait dependent whether direct or indirect selection yielded the most response.
conclusionsEar and tail damage are heritable traits and are moderately positively correlated. The EBV for the evaluated traits related to ear and tail damage showed moderate accuracies, minor dispersion, and no bias. We hypothesize that from a welfare perspective, ear and tail damage on the original scale are the relevant breeding goal traits. For ear damage on the original scale, the highest response to selection can be expected when selecting on the trait itself, whereas for tail damage on the original scale, selection on summed damage showed the highest gain. Results from this study show that genetic improvement of the direct genetic effect of ear and tail damage is possible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.