ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2025
Qualitative Terms Used In Rhinoplasty: A Scoping Review -Toward Establishing a Bridge Between Qualitative Terminology and Quantifiability.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Cannula-Based Sequential Injection Protocol for Non-surgical Rhinoplasty in East Asian Patients.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRhinoplasty is one of the most commonly performed aesthetic surgical procedures. Both patients and surgeons rely on qualitative descriptors such as "plunging nose," "bulbous tip," or "twisted nose" to describe nasal features. Despite their frequent use, there is limited standardization of these terms and their correlation with objective measurements.
methodsA scoping review was conducted following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. The study searched three electronic databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Ovid/MEDLINE, and Web of Science) for English language articles published between 1949 and 2021. Qualitative descriptors and semi-quantitative and quantitative measures were extracted and categorized.
resultsA total of 459 studies were included, comprising retrospective studies (272), prospective studies (38), technical descriptive articles and literature reviews (180), and letters to the editor (5). Qualitative terms were recorded 23.5% (237/1007) of the time, semi-quantitative terms 16% (162/1007), and quantitative descriptions 57% (578/1007). The most commonly described nasal features were the tip (20.8%), dorsum (13.2%), and alar base (12.3%). Measurement techniques varied, with photography being the most common (60%), followed by surgeon assessment (20.3%) and 3D imaging (5.4%).
conclusionsThis review highlights a gap in the correlation between qualitative rhinoplasty descriptors and quantitative analysis. Standardization and integration of objective measurement tools may enhance clinical communication and surgical planning. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
40660031What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.