Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40660007›Full record

ReviewApplied health economics and health policy2025

Reflecting Social Values in HTA Methods: A Case Study of South Africa.

Peter Murphy, Celeste Holden, Yirui Qian, Simon Walker, Evelyn Thsehla, Susan Griffin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Applied health economics and health policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Peter MurphyCentre for Health Economics, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK. peter.murphy@york.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-8864-1416
Celeste HoldenSAMRC/WITS Centre for Health Economics and Decision Science-PRICELESS-SA, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Yirui QianCentre for Health Economics, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Simon WalkerCentre for Health Economics, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Evelyn ThsehlaSAMRC/WITS Centre for Health Economics and Decision Science-PRICELESS-SA, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Susan GriffinCentre for Health Economics, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research NIHR133252
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveSouth Africa proposes the creation of a new health technology assessment (HTA) agency. In anticipation, the South African Values and Ethics for Universal Health Coverage (SAVE-UHC) value assessment framework has been created to make explicit the attributes of social value to inform priority setting. However, operationalising these values in an HTA process requires technical economic evaluation-based methods and little consideration has been given to appropriate approaches to determine these. We therefore used a novel pragmatic approach to identify economic evaluation methods to incorporate the SAVE-UHC value attributes in HTA methods.

methodsWe mapped the SAVE-UHC elements to value attributes described in an existing value assessment framework to help identify previously described methods. A survey of experts and a workshop were conducted to supplement the methods identified in the mapping. The combined results were compiled as a list of ways the SAVE-UHC elements could be measured, valued and incorporated into economic evaluation methods.

resultsThe results revealed a comprehensive list of approaches to measuring and valuing the SAVE-UHC elements. The results were further categorised into health and the distribution of health, financial risk, healthcare utilisation, well-being, healthcare costs, performance indicators and constraints.

conclusionsSouth Africa is in the process of institutionalising HTA to guide prioritisation of new healthcare technologies. This research presents a wide range of methods that could be used in South Africa to implement SAVE-UHC. The approach could also be used in other countries seeking to implement their own value assessment frameworks and identify appropriate methods to incorporate them in HTA processes.

Indexed as

Social ValuesTechnology Assessment, BiomedicalUniversal Health InsuranceCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID40660007
PMCPMC12535936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.