Observational studyJournal of general internal medicine2026
System-Wide Implementation of Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Value-Based Care Setting.
Observational study in Journal of general internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) screening is a HEDIS measure in value-based care (VBC), but the screening rate among patients in VBC is suboptimal.
objectiveTo increase CRC screening through home-based fecal immunochemical test (FIT) among patients in VBC.
designObservational study.
participantsWe included patients aged 45-75 years in VBC (4 Medicare, 1 Medicaid plan) attributed to Northwell Health's provider panels who had not completed CRC screening for 2023 in October 2023.
interventionThe primary exposure is mailed FITs to patients' homes from November to December 2023. Patients who had not completed the kits were reached through a series of three telephone calls 3 weeks after kits were delivered. For patients with abnormal results, we coordinated fast-track referrals to gastroenterology or colonoscopy. MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcome of interest is the number and proportion of completed FIT kits. Our secondary outcome of interest is the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STAR Quality Rating for each corresponding VBC plan. KEY
resultsOut of 3680 kits mailed, 3466 (94.2%) kits were delivered. Among kits delivered, 465 (13.4%) kits were completed. We found that patients who had an appointment with providers within the last 18 months had a higher completion rate (15.9%) compared to patients who did not have a visit or had a visit more than 18 months ago (9.3%) (p-value < 0.0001). Among 45 patients with abnormal results (9.7%), 11 patients (24.4%) completed diagnostic colonoscopies and 10 patients (90.0%) were found to have tubular adenomas (May 2024). This initiative resulted in a 1 STAR increase across four value based care programs (2 Medicaid, 2 Medicare).
conclusionsThe population health initiative at scale to increase CRC screening resulted in a small, but meaningful improvement. There remain opportunities to improve CRC screening and treatment by coordinating diagnostic colonoscopies for this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.