ArticleSurgical endoscopy2025
Two decades of endoscopic detorsion in sigmoid volvulus: prognostic factors for failure.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application and Efficacy Evaluation of a Modified Ostomy Appliance in Managing Peristomal Irritant Contact Dermatitis: A Randomised Controlled Trial.International wound journal · 2025Trial
- Safety and Efficacy of Endoscopic Derotation in Colonic Volvulus Occlusion: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEndoscopic detorsion is the first-line treatment for sigmoid volvulus. However, a significant proportion of patients experience treatment failure, requiring emergency surgery, which is associated with increased morbidity. Identifying predictive factors for detorsion failure is crucial for optimizing management strategies and improving patient outcomes.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study analyzed 49 patients who underwent endoscopic detorsion for sigmoid volvulus at two tertiary hospitals in Thailand from 2004 to 2024. Demographic, clinical, and radiologic data were collected. Regression analysis, directed acyclic graphs (DAGs), and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis were used to identify factors associated with detorsion failure.
resultsOf the 49 patients who underwent endoscopic detorsion, 19 (38.8%) experienced treatment failure. Multivariable regression analysis identified BMI ≥ 18.5 kg/m2 as associated with lower odds of detorsion failure (adjusted OR: 0.12, 95% CI 0.02-0.86, p = 0.04). Cecal diameter ≥ 6.8 cm was associated with increased failure risk (adjusted OR: 5.35, 95% CI 1.08-26.58, p = 0.04). Patients in the failed detorsion group had a significantly higher rate of postoperative ostomy creation (61.1% vs. 4.5%, p < 0.001), with 72.7% of these ostomies remaining unclosed.
conclusionsOur findings suggest that patients with a cecal diameter ≥ 6.8 cm and BMI < 18.5 kg/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
40659948What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.