ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2025
Impact of National Society Guidelines and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Guidelines on Genetic Testing Use Among Patients with Breast Cancer.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetic Testing Uptake Among Patients With Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Balancing global standards and regional nuances in breast cancer care: the role of guidelines, clinical research, precision medicine, and artificial intelligence in advancing quality of care for patients worldwide.Cancer biology & medicine · 2026Article
- Anlotinib or Bevacizumab Combined with Taxane/Capecitabine for the Second-Line or Subsequent Treatment of HER-2 Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIdentifying pathogenic germline mutations in patients with breast cancer (BC) is critical with significant impact on prevention and management. The American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBrS) released guidelines in February 2019 recommending genetic testing (GT) for all patients with a personal history of BC. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of ASBrS guidelines on GT utilization for patients with BC. PATIENTS AND
methodsAt the Siteman Cancer Canter, 4421 patients were diagnosed and/or treated between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2020. Data including race/ethnicity, BC subtype, insurance, and family history of BC was independently collected by authors. Myriad Genetics database was utilized to identify patients with BC with GT. Multivariate logistic regression and difference-in-difference analyses were performed to compare GT rates pre- and post-guideline.
resultsGT rates significantly improved for all patients with BC post-guideline (50.9% versus 59.5%, p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in GT rate changes between non-Hispanic white (52.0% versus 59.8%) and non-Hispanic Black (46.9% versus 56.6%) patients (p = 0.07). Patients more likely to undergo GT included those with a family history of BC [odds ratio (OR) 2.89, p < 0.0001], triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) (OR 2.64, p < 0.0001), and invasive BC (OR 1.62, p < 0.0001). Patients less likely to receive genetic testing included those older than 50 years (OR 0.11, p < 0.0001), and those with public insurances (OR 0.42, p < 0.0001).
conclusionsASBrS guidelines significantly improved GT utilization among patients with BC, though GT rates still remained lower than guideline recommendations. Multidisciplinary efforts to implement ASBrS guidelines are critical for improved germline testing in patients with BC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40659892What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.