Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40659838›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025

X-ray2CTPA: leveraging diffusion models to enhance pulmonary embolism classification.

Noa Cahan, Eyal Klang, Galit Aviram, Yiftach Barash, Eli Konen, Raja Giryes, Hayit Greenspan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Noa CahanFaculty of Engineering, Tel Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel. noa.cahan@gmail.com.
Eyal KlangDivision of Data-Driven and Digital Medicine, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Galit AviramDepartment of Radiology, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and Tel Aviv University School of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Yiftach BarashDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel affiliated with the Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Eli KonenDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel affiliated with the Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Raja GiryesFaculty of Engineering, Tel Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Hayit GreenspanFaculty of Engineering, Tel Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.

Funding

Israel Science Foundation 20/2629
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chest X-rays or chest radiography (CXR), commonly used for medical diagnostics, typically enables limited imaging compared to computed tomography (CT) scans, which offer more detailed and accurate three-dimensional data, particularly contrast-enhanced scans like CT Pulmonary Angiography (CTPA). However, CT scans entail higher costs, greater radiation exposure, and are less accessible than CXRs. In this work, we explore cross-modal translation from a 2D low contrast-resolution X-ray input to a 3D high contrast and spatial-resolution CTPA scan. Driven by recent advances in generative AI, we introduce a novel diffusion-based approach to this task. We employ the synthesized 3D images in a classification framework and show improved AUC in a Pulmonary Embolism (PE) categorization task, using the initial CXR input. Furthermore, we evaluate the model's performance using quantitative metrics, ensuring diagnostic relevance of the generated images. The proposed method is generalizable and capable of performing additional cross-modality translations in medical imaging. It may pave the way for more accessible and cost-effective advanced diagnostic tools. The code for this project is available: https://github.com/NoaCahan/X-ray2CTPA .

Identifiers

PMID40659838
PMCPMC12259909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.