ArticleScientific reports2025
Measurement and prediction of small molecule retention by Gram-negative bacteria based on a large-scale LC/MS screen.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification of chemical features for improved outer membrane permeation in mycobacteria using machine learning.Nature microbiology · 2026Article
- Random Forest Modeling to Predict Small Molecule Accumulation in Gram-Negative Bacteria.ACS infectious diseases · 2026Article
- The Quantification of Drug Accumulation within Gram-Negative Bacteria.ACS infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Efflux-Mediated Resistance inAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The challenge of assessing intracellular accumulation represents a major hurdle to the discovery of new antibiotics with Gram-negative activity. To address this, a high-throughput assay was developed to measure compound uptake and retention in Escherichia coli using LC/MS. 13,056 diverse small molecules were screened with two isogenic E. coli strains, a wild-type and a TolC-deleted mutant. Cell-associated concentrations of 8,410 compounds were determined and 6,416 compounds were classified either as retention-positive or -negative, with 45% (2,885) positives in the TolC mutant. Of these, 60% were not retained in the wild-type strain, indicating efficient efflux. No individual structural feature or physicochemical property explained the retention behavior. Machine learning (ML) models were trained using these results, and a gradient-boosted-tree model using 36 physicochemical compound descriptors proved most accurate. The ML model demonstrated robust performance across similar and dissimilar molecule subsets, showcasing its strong generalization and real-world predictive potential. An experimental validation of the tool was performed with a set of 540 new compounds and correctly predicted retention-positive cases in 77.8% and retention-negative in 74.4%. This assay and prediction tool could enhance Gram-negative antibiotic discovery, aiding in screening library design, computational structure-based drug design, and exploration of chemical space before synthesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.