Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40659780›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Integrated diagnostic algorithm for acute vertigo combining TiTrATE, STANDING, and HINTS: a validation study in the emergency department.

Elvira Cortese, Pierre La Rochelle, Freya Patel, Nehzat Koohi, Diego Kaski

Registry-linked trialAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07421973 (The UTRAVERA), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07421973 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

The UTRAVERA: a Multicenter Prospective Observational Investigation on Vertigo and Dizziness Due to Vertebrobasilar Transient Neurological Attacks - Diagnoses, Clinical Features, Treatment Responses, and Prognostic Factors.

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of Sao Paulo General HospitalRan2026 to 2028Enrolled400ConditionsVertigo, Dizziness, TIA (Transient Ischemic Attack), Transient Neurologic Symptoms
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Acute vertigo: stroke or not?Current opinion in neurology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elvira CorteseSENSE research unit, Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6547-2194
Pierre La RochelleDépartement de Médecine Familiale et Médecine d'Urgence, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
Freya PatelSENSE research unit, Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
Nehzat KoohiSENSE research unit, Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK. n.koohi@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1545-8527
Diego KaskiSENSE research unit, Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK. d.kaski@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0591-646X

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research NIHR302201
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate diagnosis of acute vertigo (AV) in emergency settings is crucial due to varied underlying causes. Challenges include differentiating non-life-threatening conditions, like vestibular migraine, from severe issues, such as stroke. The "TiTrATE - STANDING Adapted" algorithm was created to help non-specialist emergency physicians diagnose posterior circulation strokes in AV patients, overcoming the limitations of current practices that require specialized knowledge and equipment. This study involved a prospective validation and retrospective analysis of 67 patients at the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery and University College London Hospital. Patients underwent objective oculomotor assessments through video oculography and pure tone audiometry, conducted by an experienced audiologist in the acute stage. The accuracy of the "TiTrATE - STANDING Adapted" algorithm was compared to final diagnoses made by specialists, which included a comprehensive review of medical histories, objective test results, and imaging studies. The "TiTrATE - STANDING Adapted" algorithm demonstrated a sensitivity of 90%, with low specificity (57.9%), resulting in a high rate of false positives (24 out of 67) and a global accuracy of 62.7%. Conditions such as vestibular migraine and chronic vascular issues (e.g., orthostatic hypotension) were often misclassified, impacting the overall specificity. Integrating TiTrATE, HINTS Plus, and STANDING into a single diagnostic algorithm for acute vertigo in the ED could enhance accuracy and streamline decision-making. However, the combined model must perform at least as well as its individual components. Key improvements needed before implementation include adding vestibular migraine criteria, refining stroke exclusion guidelines, and ongoing validation to boost diagnostic precision and patient outcomes.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsEmergency Service, HospitalVertigoAcute DiseaseAdultAgedAudiometry, Pure-ToneDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityStrokeDiagnostic algorithmsEmergency departmentMigraine disordersStrokeTiTrATE-STANDING and HINTS plusVertigo

Identifiers

PMID40659780
PMCPMC12259883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.