ArticleScientific reports2025
Evaluating the strength properties of high-performance concrete in the form of ensemble and hybrid models using deep learning techniques.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the behavior of concrete, factors such as particle types, water content, aggregates, additives, and binders significantly influence its Compressive Strength (CS) properties. This study develops hybrid and ensemble models to predict compressive CS and slump flow of high-performance concrete (HPC) using a dataset of 191 mixtures. Admixtures like fly ash and silica fume enhance HPC through hydraulic or pozzolanic activity. Understanding the relationships between HPC components is crucial for computational analysis of CS properties. Deep learning techniques, including hybrid and ensemble methods, were developed to predict these properties with high accuracy. This paper focuses on forecasting models using T-SFIS, GBMBoost, and Decision Tree, combined with metaheuristic algorithms (GWO, QPSO) in hybrid and ensemble frameworks. Sensitivity analysis via SHAP and tenfold cross-validation evaluated model performance. Results showed that the GWO-based GBQP model achieved superior performance ([Formula: see text]=0.998, RMSE = 1.216 MPa for compressive CS). The ensemble DGT model ranked second, while T-SFIS performed lowest. For slump flow, TSQP excelled ([Formula: see text]=0.984, RMSE = 3.233 mm), closely followed by GBQP. These advanced techniques significantly enhance the efficiency and accuracy of predicting HPC CS properties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.