ArticleScientific reports2025
An iterative strategy to design 4-1BB agonist nanobodies de novo with generative AI models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeted biologics for TNBC: Advances in nanobodies, antibodies, peptides, and aptamers.Molecular therapy. Oncology · 2026Review
- Clinical insight-driven novel drug development: Multidisciplinary integration and transformative opportunities.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The 4-1BB receptor, a key member of the tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFR) family, represents a highly promising target for cancer immunotherapy. In this study, we developed a novel in silico pipeline to design VHH domain antibodies targeting 4-1BB, leveraging knowledge-based amino acid distributions to generate optimized complementarity-determining region (CDR) sequences. Our computational approach progressively refined nanobody binding properties, yielding designs with binding scores comparable to or exceeding those of an established reference nanobody. From an initial set of 80 top-ranked de novo sequences, 65 were successfully assembled, with 35 validated by sequencing. Although this screening round did not yield a high-affinity binder in vitro, the results provide critical insights into the relationship between initial design parameters and successful genetic assembly. These findings highlight the potential of our pipeline while identifying key areas for further refinement, particularly in optimizing deep-learning models for antibody development. This work advances the broader effort to harness computational design for high-precision therapeutic antibody discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.