ArticleScientific reports2025
ECMO and impella increase stroke risk in acute myocardial infarction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impella-Assisted Coronary Bypass With Massive Stroke From Aortic Side Arm Graft Thrombosis.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Recent advances in percutaneous coronary intervention for modernizing coronary physiology-guided and device-based strategies for coronary revascularization.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Development of a Nomogram to Classify In-Hospital Atrial Fibrillation Among Patients Hospitalized With Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Retrospective Case-Control Study.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is limited data on the risk of stroke in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) treated with temporary mechanical circulatory support devices. Retrospective data were extracted from the U.S. National Inpatient Sample between October 2015 and December 2020, involving hospitalizations for AMI. The final cohort comprised: 4,370,069 hospitalizations with medical therapy only, 136,005 with intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) only, 41,560 with Impella only, and 10,695 with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) utilized during hospitalization. The overall stroke rates for patients receiving medical therapy only, IABP only, Impella only, and ECMO were 3.39%, 3.56%, 4.54%, and 13.14%, respectively. Specifically, ischemic stroke rates were 2.93%, 3.17%, 3.96%, and 9.91%, and hemorrhagic stroke rates were 0.69%, 0.59%, 0.87%, and 4.77% for the respective groups. In stepwise forward Cox regression analysis, ECMO use was associated with the highest adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for overall stroke (aOR 3.04, 95% CI [2.66-3.48]), followed by Impella alone (aOR 1.79, 95% CI [1.61-2.00]) and atrial fibrillation (aOR 1.34, 95% CI [1.31-1.38]). However, IABP use showed no significant association with increased stroke risk in either univariate or multivariate analyses. While IABP use is not associated with an increased risk of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, ECMO and Impella use are linked to a higher stroke risk, particularly for ECMO-treated AMI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.